Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 10540 invoked from network); 2 Mar 2001 18:59:30 -0000 Received: from smtp4vepub.gte.net (HELO smtp4ve.mailsrvcs.net) (206.46.170.25) by h31.sny.collab.net with SMTP; 2 Mar 2001 18:59:30 -0000 Received: from alfred.bear.com (adsl-141-151-136-122.bellatlantic.net [141.151.136.122]) by smtp4ve.mailsrvcs.net (8.9.1/8.9.1) with SMTP id TAA6279913 for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2001 19:05:56 GMT From: Roy Wilson Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2001 19:00:50 GMT Message-ID: <20010302.19005000@alfred.bear.com> Subject: RE: Just another Benchmark To: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Mozilla/3.0 (compatible; StarOffice/5.2;Linux) X-Priority: 3 (Normal) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N Hi, See below. Roy > -----Original Message----- > From: Thomas Bezdicek [mailto:t.bezdicek@lgsoft.at] > Sent: 02 March 2001 09:50 > To: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org > Subject: Just another Benchmark > Hi, > we tried the apachebench on our solaris system, to check out > differences between architectures and thereby we found a quite > interesting behaviour. > When serving a static page, apache uses the whole machine > resources while tomcat isn't (CPU usage 100% to 20%) and for > maybe this reason isn't serving at the same speed as apache. > Is there a limit somewhere in the java net or in tomcat? Just curious: you say "CPU usage 100%". I guess what I'm asking is=20 whether you assume that Apache keeps the CPU busy 100% of the time based= =20 on the ratio of the throughputs (requests per second) or whether you=20 measured CPU busy using sar (or something like it). FWIW, in measurement= s=20 of Apache I've done, I've rarely seen CPU utilization above about 75%. Roy