Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 30846 invoked from network); 2 Feb 2001 20:40:03 -0000 Received: from patan.sun.com (192.18.98.43) by h31.sny.collab.net with SMTP; 2 Feb 2001 20:40:03 -0000 Received: from centralmail1.Central.Sun.COM ([129.147.62.10]) by patan.sun.com (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA25099 for ; Fri, 2 Feb 2001 12:40:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from esun1as-mm. (esun1as-mm.Central.Sun.COM [129.147.34.144]) by centralmail1.Central.Sun.COM (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3/ENSMAIL,v2.1p1) with SMTP id NAA19826 for ; Fri, 2 Feb 2001 13:40:07 -0700 (MST) Received: from eng.sun.com by esun1as-mm. (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id NAA11879; Fri, 2 Feb 2001 13:58:21 -0700 Message-ID: <3A7B1B1B.902791D0@eng.sun.com> Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2001 12:39:56 -0800 From: "Craig R. McClanahan" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en]C-CCK-MCD {Sony} (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Subject: Re: 3.2.2 Release? References: <000a01c08d57$0da963d0$0300a8c0@cx1002407b> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N David Weinrich wrote: > On a somewhat unrelated note... > I noticed a bugrat report this morning on an urlencoding that I had > submitted a patch for a little while back ( which was flawed/incomplete ). > In the process of redoing the patch and grabbing the source from cvs I came > up against this issue: what the heck tag is appropriate to use to submit > bugfixes against for the 3.2.x version of Tomcat? I am assuming that > tomcat_32 is the appropriate place but... > Yes, that is the correct place -- "tomcat_32" is a branch that contains the current state of the 3.2 codebase (i.e. all the patches for 3.2.1, plus patches that have been committed since then). Craig