Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-tez-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-tez-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6B0BF177DA for ; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 02:41:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 2860 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2014 02:41:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tez-issues-archive@tez.apache.org Received: (qmail 2805 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2014 02:41:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact issues-help@tez.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@tez.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list issues@tez.apache.org Received: (qmail 2795 invoked by uid 99); 22 Oct 2014 02:41:34 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas.apache.org) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 02:41:34 +0000 Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 02:41:34 +0000 (UTC) From: "Siddharth Seth (JIRA)" To: issues@tez.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (TEZ-1638) Missing type parametrization in UnorderedKVInputConfig? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEZ-1638?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14179499#comment-14179499 ] Siddharth Seth commented on TEZ-1638: ------------------------------------- Critical since it affects the API. > Missing type parametrization in UnorderedKVInputConfig? > -------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: TEZ-1638 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEZ-1638 > Project: Apache Tez > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Kostas Tzoumas > Assignee: Kostas Tzoumas > Priority: Critical > > In UnorderedInputConfig (https://github.com/apache/tez/blob/master/tez-runtime-library/src/main/java/org/apache/tez/runtime/library/conf/UnorderedKVInputConfig.java) some methods of SpecificBuilder have a parameterized return type (SpecificBuilder) and some a non-parameterized return type (SpecificBuilder). > Shouldn't all methods return the parameterized version? -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)