Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C74B200C8B for ; Mon, 22 May 2017 23:39:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 3AF6E160BBF; Mon, 22 May 2017 21:39:10 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 81E6F160BAD for ; Mon, 22 May 2017 23:39:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 3763 invoked by uid 500); 22 May 2017 21:39:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@tephra.incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@tephra.incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@tephra.incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 3752 invoked by uid 99); 22 May 2017 21:39:07 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 May 2017 21:39:07 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 9A98F1AA951 for ; Mon, 22 May 2017 21:39:06 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -99.202 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-99.202 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[KAM_ASCII_DIVIDERS=0.8, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id e2rZXinHmLan for ; Mon, 22 May 2017 21:39:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org [209.188.14.139]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTP id 269E15FB40 for ; Mon, 22 May 2017 21:39:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (unknown [207.244.88.139]) by mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 5EE5AE07E1 for ; Mon, 22 May 2017 21:39:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jira-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at jira-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id 1B06B21B58 for ; Mon, 22 May 2017 21:39:04 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 21:39:04 +0000 (UTC) From: "ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)" To: dev@tephra.incubator.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (TEPHRA-228) Introduce client ID that can be used to track requests per client MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 archived-at: Mon, 22 May 2017 21:39:10 -0000 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEPHRA-228?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16020241#comment-16020241 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on TEPHRA-228: --------------------------------------- Github user poornachandra commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/incubator-tephra/pull/42#discussion_r117851160 --- Diff: tephra-core/src/main/java/org/apache/tephra/distributed/TransactionServiceClient.java --- @@ -125,15 +130,20 @@ public static void doMain(boolean verbose, Configuration conf) throws Exception } } + public TransactionServiceClient(Configuration config, ThriftClientProvider clientProvider) { --- End diff -- Please add javadocs for the public constructor. > Introduce client ID that can be used to track requests per client > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: TEPHRA-228 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEPHRA-228 > Project: Tephra > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: api, core > Reporter: Poorna Chandra > Assignee: Gokul Gunasekaran > Fix For: 0.12.0-incubating > > > Today transaction manager does not have details of what transaction belongs to which client. For instance when a there are a lot of invalid transactions generated by a client, it is not easy to say which client generated the invalid transactions. Transaction manager just logs a message saying the transaction ID was invalidated. This makes debugging very difficult since there is no easy way to map the transaction ID to a program. > Transaction APIs should allow clients to pass in client IDs for every start transaction call. Transaction manager can store this client ID as part of the transaction metadata. And when transaction manager logs messages with transaction ID, it can include the client ID in the message. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346)