From users-return-28060-archive-asf-public=cust-asf.ponee.io@subversion.apache.org Tue Jun 4 05:35:08 2019 Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [207.244.88.153]) by mx-eu-01.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 981E418064D for ; Tue, 4 Jun 2019 07:35:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 70613 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jun 2019 05:35:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@subversion.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list users@subversion.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for users@subversion.apache.org Received: (qmail 16259 invoked by uid 99); 4 Jun 2019 04:56:13 -0000 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd4-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fmod-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fmod-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=XXNNij2pApGIv+oqDntvlRjdxGKmbX723eyVnHM/P28=; b=UBnLPoKN+gikNkBaUpvCNy70Qb/csoo8shG/cWJAbjDmBb21OCgQQXhw5dgna5mu9a o/pJwX3AQbCL3L7AHin7RSou5Y+6vAUsaNkBcPgcGDKflp1thYayhyGEhqhT5PXdHIw0 9FU1cGbJZY7WMMsm/BmZCzmxJ0FyGUt8DZ2B+6/FLa8AsdH0j9cOc4RryFwsO3KjxfDZ AvKdJy7wFRrKbt0dYFFP9O61wJRlVwayzIXp6icVzrwc0HOupTTEIEuNaDOkwDWm4Ade EHz8jA1W2lm1qnwYP1oKVQb+ZhWGZqbHi+SioRaEOi2fATaZf9wVHo6YaYueicedXxol ypew== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=XXNNij2pApGIv+oqDntvlRjdxGKmbX723eyVnHM/P28=; b=C+QOB2sH5K77OtYu3Cy4TxIP6ALvutZOvSqbIKznjpp4JE/Q2iMdrWPjAOJxXrGxys OK1Uqq9ivgVDholFxTZ2QtfG0ZaGUNhZDmpTUfJQ1AurOuw0Pdk6mb/3UPZGsYq8oVU0 efZWcA3WwiNbFq6tQYvSvc+IJkNLCldHhLC09SmRQdir6X1VdCKRMjCOixFOBfjQVUnP 9JS1k+VqWdv4V7FlIoPqhRP5x2NwTYFBuHIsUoezwZ1F+rAMdwGkqifWjlahU1YarE7i yEECztPOngt2wUsI2oTMIjxOc/a6HNET5egrANIaB8PPNUhDr9+W15vX4McfWLM4HIhx tikg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXlrntPORg8da6ZUHmvY/lI03cy/18BV5dW8zEIw6jMDzCkmUrc vXkwASYmcRo7etrziteNKkyhE8hxR9NXnmJjaRPNfkyMfnY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyIfdC7eVnz3WnCZZ99TfgoSS85dHrKQdlrLOCxDQfH3gqq+6PaGrMAu9uAlfK8Au6428AhrvvBA9DdXJhSv/M= X-Received: by 2002:a0c:89f3:: with SMTP id 48mr6170540qvs.68.1559624169124; Mon, 03 Jun 2019 21:56:09 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Thuan Seah Tan Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2019 14:55:29 +1000 Message-ID: Subject: svn status and info slowness when multiple files are passed as args To: users@subversion.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000958928058a784c7e" --000000000000958928058a784c7e Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Wondering if anyone has experienced slowness when running commandline svn if multiple files are passed to svn status or svn info? For example: svn status directory/file1.txt directory/file2.txt directory/file3.txt In my tests, the output is generated at about the rate of 1 file per second when doing so. Running svn status on the entire directory recursively turns out to be much faster. Thuan --000000000000958928058a784c7e Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Wondering if anyone has experienced slowness when running = commandline svn if multiple files are passed to svn status or svn info?=C2= =A0

For example:
svn status directory/file1.tx= t directory/file2.txt directory/file3.txt

In my te= sts, the output is generated at about the rate of 1 file per second when do= ing so. Running svn status on the entire directory recursively turns out to= be much faster.



Thu= an
--000000000000958928058a784c7e--