subversion-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Doros Agathangelou <ntzim...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Problem with svndumpfilter
Date Fri, 08 Jun 2018 08:20:18 GMT
Another option is to use Subdivision, a commercial tool that is
designed to do exactly these kinds of operations, in other works
Delete files, Extract files, Split repositories in two parts.
Subdivision reads the repository structure in memory and 'understands'
the structure of your repository. It can therefore create the
necessary derived selections from your selections to make sure that
the delete operation succeeds in the first pass. In this example,
Subdivision would make sure that /branches/develop/dir2 would be
available for the copy to be made from it (or that both source and
copy would both be unavailable - depending on the user selections).

Subdivision is a Windows application but we are working on a Linux
solution too. You can try a demo by visiting http://subdi.vision

Goes without saying that we are affiliated with Subdivision and we are
sorry for the shameless advertising but we believe people in this
group will benefit from knowing that Subdivision exists.



On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 6:08 PM Stefan Sperling <stsp@elego.de> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 07, 2018 at 10:40:51AM -0400, Alfred von Campe wrote:
> > Thanks, Stefan.  The path of least resistance for me is to use the script you pointed
me to.  However, it seems that the exclude feature is not yet implemented:
> >
> >   try:
> >     if args[0] == 'include':
> >       sys.exit(analyze_logs(map(sanitize_path, targets)))
> >     elif args[0] == 'exclude':
> >       usage_and_exit("Feature not implemented")
> >     else:
> >       usage_and_exit("Valid subcommands are 'include' and 'exclude'")
> >
> > Is there a more recent version of this script?
>
> I am afraid not. The link I provided points to the latest version of
> this script we have in our repository.  We would welcome patches to
> the script. However, since the problem has been fixed in SVN 1.10's
> version of 'svnadmin' I think it makes more sense to just use 1.10.
>
> You could install 1.10 binaries somewhere next to your existing SVN
> installation and use the 1.10 svnadmin binary to create a dump file.
> The resulting dump file will be compatible with older versions.

Mime
View raw message