Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0F5E200D06 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2017 16:02:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id BF2A71609BB; Mon, 25 Sep 2017 14:02:18 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 10BEF1609C4 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2017 16:02:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 28489 invoked by uid 500); 25 Sep 2017 14:02:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@subversion.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list users@subversion.apache.org Received: (qmail 28479 invoked by uid 99); 25 Sep 2017 14:02:11 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Sep 2017 14:02:11 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 59A4A1A399A for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2017 14:02:11 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.379 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.379 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd2-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pB4fkxlhZCvm for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2017 14:02:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-oi0-f52.google.com (mail-oi0-f52.google.com [209.85.218.52]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 06A8161036 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2017 14:02:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oi0-f52.google.com with SMTP id n82so2000667oib.8 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2017 07:02:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=UwYHLVwayDo/D7NYd6nvSX+gz045gwRoZoodUbL+P5g=; b=MxHpZql4JpjQwgmHjzt3ARsLfXEHRUJ7XAAPoyt9uLdZB6Ot82KHcIbh8BcV+iaP8I zP5/5/0/reHx6wI4E5YQUNIQU+3MXSFRgq+unQ80gYrXcuJqklpMfh2NN4msup2MiYSN r5uJhwIc/7VViu21JpIN4NAcJeFOX30NQi+JgeuwheneUkzbkaOFMIMSy/Gu1v+9rmgo NvKZRtyJLILqZtE9OdrJFKZejrUuhC3reMwOoFxMukr8jGYbkNSJCWumbWptDLG8zoo7 jxK+LSqTvAocUvdb4lRHEaxKuLLWqGGNQpWxmhnrZ/Y1Q2WpItF1L5E6hKkG/jGysuLD AzeQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=UwYHLVwayDo/D7NYd6nvSX+gz045gwRoZoodUbL+P5g=; b=jDVI1rLsKMb3V2OvkFco4e4FJJlY1tn0LvmTh0nTUTw2Tz4FxwUcNQ1P0VGedlFNVy k1+GS/bPNEYXgPyxAZ1uTzK1fsonB2l7zs6AiSEekbT1mklbvei60TCxzcLjpkriMwem rUuBkGj3hUl3vDfW9JspDRCUoBbwy7wRkshFjwFehQdm+8/R30tgETOkzHUWHRsZRJ2M SZX18GDQz5WS5/7/BKoRvcYeuMNMYIPceftEIe0liYVT4ihTuVn8q/B1FDZ9WxAw6CDK x2pYUL+h5kg6m3y2T/9KbtskgOQMBWtAkF9NrbWdmPXz6mo3cEqPDe3fSdSeSaZ4iJYT BOLA== X-Gm-Message-State: AHPjjUjlilx0k2Z8X/toCwTFJAm3FCyXy6OLkqx+AcA3uMeqJwsVz7fD KeC59Fznnlhg5RRuQC/KvoNpenkTV1T/ocI+FCQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QCQJ/BGli0K7F/84pnt/W+O+gG8y1sm2enq2EvpcuzhH0b+F1Ru9v3Yqfxp9ecIsDr0sjjlJJJqdP7YYND0t6c= X-Received: by 10.157.30.161 with SMTP id n30mr348241otn.198.1506348123645; Mon, 25 Sep 2017 07:02:03 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.74.153.107 with HTTP; Mon, 25 Sep 2017 07:02:02 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <11dada8c-6708-f59e-250b-110b13e151c4@apache.org> References: <11dada8c-6708-f59e-250b-110b13e151c4@apache.org> From: Nico Kadel-Garcia Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2017 10:02:02 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Subversion version 1.6.11 (r934486) package To: =?UTF-8?Q?Branko_=C4=8Cibej?= Cc: Fei Peng , "users@subversion.apache.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable archived-at: Mon, 25 Sep 2017 14:02:18 -0000 On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 12:32 AM, Branko =C4=8Cibej wrot= e: > On 25.09.2017 02:50, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: >> On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 8:46 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wr= ote: >> >>> That published version is 1.9.3, but it actually has some upstream >>> support at RedHat. I've done personal builds, and used to publish to >>> RPMforge, and it's not worth the work. >> Sorry, I realized I was unclear. Unless you really enjoy unfurling the >> building of bleeding edge software, or someone is paying you for it, >> it's much safer and faster to get a tested build from your favorite >> upstream distributor, even if it's not the latest version. The switch >> from 1.9.3 to 1.9.7 would not, in my opinion. justify the work of >> taking this project on to build it locally if you have a day job. Been >> there, done that, have published hundreds of update RPM's, and unless >> you like to develop RPM's or handbuild software to feel empowered, >> it's not worth the work. > > So of course it's always worth taking a look at > > http://opensource.wandisco.com/centos/7/svn-1.9/ > > which does have 1.9.7. *True*. And I see that wandisco has chosen to make it a yum enabled repository, which is cool and makes updates easier. Unfortunately, it also includes upgrades and system replacements for "serf" and "mod_dav", which are requirements for the Subversion update but will replace Red Hat published versions of those components. That can make dependency handling tricky if you run other web services on the Subversion server.