Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28DA72009F8 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2016 11:44:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 27735160A2A; Fri, 3 Jun 2016 09:44:20 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 71710160A25 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2016 11:44:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 88218 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2016 09:44:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@subversion.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list users@subversion.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for users@subversion.apache.org Received: (qmail 47096 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jun 2016 07:36:38 -0000 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.879 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.879 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd1-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=polarion.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=polarion.com; s=google; h=from:mime-version:thread-index:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=tewXqmHt88nomkRIBCRwj4VhnV0VN8yavQ+1td5IMw0=; b=Ug/Hmp/wDSOognHYb+K1mvdClcslHgF7oXFMlqb0bOyzIeLZnU4QqJG97p3iuUlA+I YwoZzAmKN3QHYnzO4fhNMlkdDO97gVYzfnWnCowcYkjnwT4VQA6czJfirhFDCg6F6sae k9yGjetbdhARiTaGqd55+4tjg/NCUtM4KMKkg= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:mime-version:thread-index:date:message-id :subject:to; bh=tewXqmHt88nomkRIBCRwj4VhnV0VN8yavQ+1td5IMw0=; b=Qbh0HlcKad3gKM93jf/Jef+CSVuzgqjX0tWK0O0VK9I7vqUcOY0/EcW7YlR6yEQLKQ VmL77vTZiWxC/PEt3dvbhgONPi2S2avyWDb1PfyZAN3h1DNjSnqD3238CXbdZxxU2HuW h+r9lLooe3VJuQ5LHw8kB/OYbfUKmN9p5cYOAsrqp0vvMn9SwIMIzcrOwt9eilOzao0R HmWbOd2cHW/CUrnErMXgf+7Xn3SW9D0FyueOTw8XDYx/n7E0ckNgCkpyxkzXWcI1xqZt U3nYrYi6TnbKr9ytEk0nH/IbNjrfu/yqNvuJRsdccWv4cVe0kj1gzF8FL3gnRE1w1f83 vHGQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tIUrSPqcxfxDkshGD1bJlQVdJLT8PGrAomlWvgr8Y1048lTxp9PekHdBLy2mv7HCEsk3+DAk+ipbDqXKfa+ X-Received: by 10.13.219.74 with SMTP id d71mr1405873ywe.293.1464939389554; Fri, 03 Jun 2016 00:36:29 -0700 (PDT) From: Radek Krotil MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AdG9Z7l5ebZ1Zo9xR/KjjV2zaUBN5w== Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2016 09:36:24 +0200 Message-ID: <48a61c1eae5637915160adf7f1be4955@mail.gmail.com> Subject: "Offset too large" error when packing repository in FSFS 7 format To: users@subversion.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114fcad6eec8d705345ac7d5 archived-at: Fri, 03 Jun 2016 09:44:20 -0000 --001a114fcad6eec8d705345ac7d5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello. Today, I encountered a problem when trying to pack a repository after migrating it to the FSFS 7 format by performing full dump / load sequence. Shortly, I get the following error =E2=80=9CPacking revisions in shard 5...svnadmin: E160056: Offset 391658998= too large in revision 5102=E2=80=9D I was not able to understand from the documentation, what settings in fsfs.conf should be modified to workaround this problem. Neither search in the Internet brought any light into this. Is it even possible? The mentioned revision seems to be a result of an user error. It resulted in adding 169,200 paths to the repository. The delta file of the revision 5102 is 394141477 B. Subversion 1.9.3 was used when performing this operation on CentOS 7.2. FSFS 7 backed uses default configuration (therefore deltification is used). Originally, the repository was stored in FSFS 6 format with default settings (no deltification). Packing the repository in old format finished successfully and the pack file size was about 831 MB. Looking forward to hearing any guidance how to configure my backend so that I can eventually pack the repository in the new format. Thanks, Radek Krotil --001a114fcad6eec8d705345ac7d5 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hello.

=C2=A0

Today, I encountered a problem when tr= ying to pack a repository after migrating it to the FSFS 7 format by perfor= ming full dump / load sequence. Shortly, I get the following error
=E2= =80=9CPacking revisions in shard 5...svnadmin: E160056: Offset 391658998 to= o large in revision 5102=E2=80=9D

I was not able= to understand from the documentation, what settings in fsfs.conf should be= modified to workaround this problem. Neither search in the Internet brough= t any light into this. Is it even possible?

=C2= =A0

The mentioned revision seems to be a result o= f an user error. It resulted in adding 169,200 paths to the repository. The= delta file of the revision 5102 is 394141477 B. Subversion 1.9.3 was used = when performing this operation on CentOS 7.2. FSFS 7 backed uses default co= nfiguration (therefore deltification is used).

= =C2=A0

Originally, the repository was stored in F= SFS 6 format with default settings (no deltification). Packing the reposito= ry in old format finished successfully and the pack file size was about 831= MB.

=C2=A0

Looking for= ward to hearing any guidance how to configure my backend so that I can even= tually pack the repository in the new format.

=C2= =A0

Thanks,

Radek Kroti= l

--001a114fcad6eec8d705345ac7d5--