Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-subversion-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-subversion-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9313A1975E for ; Fri, 1 Apr 2016 08:04:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 1687 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2016 08:04:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-subversion-users-archive@subversion.apache.org Received: (qmail 1651 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2016 08:04:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@subversion.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list users@subversion.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for users@subversion.apache.org Received: (qmail 98309 invoked by uid 99); 1 Apr 2016 08:01:09 -0000 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.02 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.02 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY=1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01] autolearn=disabled From: "Osipov, Michael" To: "users@subversion.apache.org" Subject: Mimicking mvn_authz_svn with svnauthz(1) Thread-Topic: Mimicking mvn_authz_svn with svnauthz(1) Thread-Index: AdGL64DhSu6CIdTNR2qyVe8Vqw65dw== Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2016 08:00:56 +0000 Message-ID: <68644224DA0DE64CA5A49838ED219A0425B3F4E9@DEFTHW99EJ5MSX.ww902.siemens.net> Accept-Language: de-DE, en-US Content-Language: de-DE X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [139.22.70.45] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi folks, I am trying to figure out how I can effectively mimic the behavior of mod_authz_svn with svnauth(1). I do have a small, read-only PHP application which shall browse a repo just like mod_dav_svn does with the same authz. While calling svnauthz(1) works well, I am not certain when I should use '--recursive' or not. Looking at mod_authz_svn.c for the switch case with r->method_number, I do see that it is only necessary for COPY, MOVE, DELETE and default. In terms of read-only access, I don't need recursive checks. Is that correct? Thanks, Michael