Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-subversion-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-subversion-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6E5EC1820A for ; Thu, 3 Mar 2016 08:30:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 22043 invoked by uid 500); 3 Mar 2016 08:30:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-subversion-users-archive@subversion.apache.org Received: (qmail 22004 invoked by uid 500); 3 Mar 2016 08:30:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@subversion.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list users@subversion.apache.org Received: (qmail 21994 invoked by uid 99); 3 Mar 2016 08:30:10 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Mar 2016 08:30:10 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 4DFD11A04B1 for ; Thu, 3 Mar 2016 08:30:10 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.802 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.802 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd2-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SH4cZ8n_gthS for ; Thu, 3 Mar 2016 08:30:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qg0-f49.google.com (mail-qg0-f49.google.com [209.85.192.49]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 9EA3F5F56F for ; Thu, 3 Mar 2016 08:30:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qg0-f49.google.com with SMTP id w104so11627046qge.1 for ; Thu, 03 Mar 2016 00:30:08 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=5v7Vd4o8721C6k6zgvL+wsoAzf1OVjrq1111c/5eGvE=; b=pc8sUatpi/wn5YyM3iCbXBuOp9wg10LzjKH+aFLU7pYSpUxAHKWsZHF1w4KnD2OC61 1l9+EFPdAq5lGfRTVP4tdgSbmnG7F9x6IpdtmEIFoHHXPlAwsgfAlbdrF1GDhEKDWz+p YouRf76lX1+BB4yCn0Xq3mafzpSKLYwY872ul+l5hXwfnwiOzKiem48FoM3EOgOitZFq Mh3xdQzrhzE/SFhHPm8R1eCFiieRmsa2eCh9eBtNGVjaXIhgqcWn3WunAYyTA8VQpPVt eV2XXtGJa4XKaG548/QLA4hMfy4bMUfpcK/eQB5IS6JiSNZg/kxOnj8OUwko0muQ4sbY 414w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=5v7Vd4o8721C6k6zgvL+wsoAzf1OVjrq1111c/5eGvE=; b=YFiMlAIG3aKYdLWRJaLZZW1KrghCRR4e2u48UtSDMwjR32V7lACUwiTDfCtdKoYSR2 XkrtKV7afWYsD2uJUXRQ0nI3SmiZM0kYhnpZy6KLB00WkNg9R8cieRulg4aIHWIAkaHO 62NOV2BDlzyPu1f5volPfWxfjQRP5WyQqg4m4LGgY3npZeJb51aFzH5D8JKXnmazkATg NnsJTZN4JhRQeuAXbeJyAdZavTruH7LgroygvL6THBZWapV5imrqJW9EeiCggvjYhNp1 Nb6mJbpx/CdN5OPid5HMlCSrqZEa59GOkXlr7lfOF5MEcUPffokb+u/qt/AMD49HzEnX g7Hg== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJIvkXKw1FkSgMRar2bInvhRdlg4sig+54h0WdeKAJ9+RtSDiDORuDLBukyHbNxridX6cQ2BFDOPUULclQ== X-Received: by 10.140.170.70 with SMTP id q67mr1604540qhq.8.1456993801881; Thu, 03 Mar 2016 00:30:01 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.55.149.5 with HTTP; Thu, 3 Mar 2016 00:29:42 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1433585537.2004032.1456951996194.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> References: <1433585537.2004032.1456951996194.JavaMail.yahoo.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <1433585537.2004032.1456951996194.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> From: Johan Corveleyn Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2016 09:29:42 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Weird Behaviour: Files reverted that didn't show up in a status --no-ignore To: webster.brent@rogers.com Cc: "users@subversion.apache.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 9:53 PM, wrote: > We are running VisualSVN 1.9.3 server on a Windows box and a user's > workspace is on a Centos6.5 Linux box. > He had just done a "svn update" and the build failed. No conflicts as far > as I can tell. The "svn status" showed the build artifacts and his modified > files. As a suggestion, he would "svn revert -R ." all his changes. During > the revert, it showed numerous other SVN element(cpp & h) files being > reverted that he never touched and the "svn status --no-ignore" never > showed. We tried reproducing it but no luck. > > I'm in the process of switching over a bunch of "old", hardened Clearcase > folks to SVN so this little weirdness is never good to see. Would still be unexpected / weird, but: is it possible that those files were not really changed, but that 'revert' simply generated unnecessary notifications (showing 'reverted file X' for files that weren't really changed)? You didn't mention the version of svn client. Maybe it's a notification bug in the client that's already fixed? -- Johan