subversion-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Bert Huijben" <b...@qqmail.nl>
Subject RE: Svn 1.9 repository 20% bigger than svn 1.8 repository
Date Mon, 01 Feb 2016 11:30:46 GMT


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stefan Sperling [mailto:stsp@elego.de]
> Sent: maandag 1 februari 2016 11:11
> To: Philip Martin <philip.martin@wandisco.com>
> Cc: Stefan Fuhrmann <stefan2@apache.org>; Gert Kello
> <gert.kello@gmail.com>; users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Svn 1.9 repository 20% bigger than svn 1.8 repository
> 
> On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 10:06:19AM +0000, Philip Martin wrote:
> > Stefan Fuhrmann <stefan2@apache.org> writes:
> >
> > > So, all user content is there and merely the deduplication failed
> > > (as already being investigated elsewhere in this thread).
> >
> > I suppose format 7 might allow us to implement a system that fixes
> > missing deduplication during packing.
> 
> And perhaps get rid of sqlite in the repository while at it?

I think at least that last part will require a format 8. Optimizing pack
should (theoretically) be possible without a format bump. We could even
backport changes that allow this, but I'm still waiting on real world test
experience with format 7. 

There are still far too many users delaying their upgrades to 1.9 waiting
for others to switch :(

Waiting for the ASF to perform a major upgrade is on reason I hear quite
often...

	Bert


Mime
View raw message