Mailing-List: contact users-help@subversion.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
From: "Cooke, Mark" <mark.cooke@siemens.com>
To: "users@subversion.apache.org" <users@subversion.apache.org>
CC: Bert Huijben <bert@qqmail.nl>
Subject: RE: svn 1.8.13 test failures: wc-queries-test.exe and move_tests.py
Thread-Topic: svn 1.8.13 test failures: wc-queries-test.exe and move_tests.py
Thread-Index: AdCaEik/gagW8u+xT96KC51Kwh0/A////noA//u/U3A=
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2015 06:23:35 +0000
Message-ID: 
 <AFFC460063A40F4BB5A536CE937EA7541BD063@DEFTHW99EL4MSX.ww902.siemens.net>
References: 
 <AFFC460063A40F4BB5A536CE937EA7541BCD88@DEFTHW99EL4MSX.ww902.siemens.net>
 <989a01d09a22$2b604780$8220d680$@qqmail.nl>
In-Reply-To: <989a01d09a22$2b604780$8220d680$@qqmail.nl>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0

> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Cooke, Mark [mailto:mark.cooke@siemens.com]
> > Sent: vrijdag 29 mei 2015 15:21
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I am trying to compile svn (and httpd) with VS2008 (for python 2.7
> > compatibility) on Win 7 Enterprise and am getting some test failures:
> > {{{
> >    win-tests.py --release --cleanup --parallel
> >    win-tests.py -r -c --httpd-dir=3Dd:\Apache24 --httpd-daemon
> > }}}
> >
> > [40/96] wc-queries-test.exe ... FAILED
> > [72/96] move_tests.py ......... success
> >
> > For #40 I noticed that Andreas confirmed [1] that r1672295 fixes a
> >  (similar?) issue (which is more recent than the 1.8.13 tag), so can
> > I safely ignore this?
>=20
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bert Huijben [mailto:bert@qqmail.nl]
> Sent: 29 May 2015 16:15
>=20
> What version of sqlite do you use,

I made a mistake and took a nightly snapshot:
- sqlite-amalgamation-201505290135.zip

> and what is the error that you see?

Apologies for not being more precise earlier, I am still finding my way aro=
und the code trees.  This is the summary:-

At least one test FAILED, checking D:\svn\src\Release\dav-tests.log
FAIL:  wc-queries-test.exe 3: test query expectations
Summary of test results:
  1950 tests PASSED
  55 tests SKIPPED
  32 tests XFAILED (1 WORK-IN-PROGRESS)
  1 test FAILED
SUMMARY: Some tests failed.

...and from the test log:-

START: wc-queries-test.exe
DBG: Using Sqlite 3.8.11
PASS:  wc-queries-test.exe 1: sqlite up-to-date
PASS:  wc-queries-test.exe 2: queries are parsable
svn_tests: E200006: STMT_SELECT_EXTERNALS_DEFINED: Uses externals with only=
 1 index component: (wc_id=3D? )
SELECT local_relpath, def_local_relpath FROM externals WHERE (wc_id =3D ?1 =
AND def_local_relpath =3D ?2)    OR (wc_id =3D ?1 AND (((def_local_relpath)=
 > (CASE (?2) WHEN '' THEN '' ELSE (?2) || '/' END)) AND ((def_local_relpat=
h) < CASE (?2) WHEN '' THEN X'FFFF' ELSE (?2) || '0' END)))=20
svn_tests: E200035: Additional errors:
svn_tests: E200035: |SEARCH TABLE externals USING COVERING INDEX I_EXTERNAL=
S_DEFINED (wc_id=3D?)
FAIL:  wc-queries-test.exe 3: test query expectations
PASS:  wc-queries-test.exe 4: test schema statistics
END: wc-queries-test.exe
ELAPSED: wc-queries-test.exe 0:00:00.125000

For the `move_tests.py` crash "success" the log states:

START: move_tests.py
PASS:  move_tests.py 1: lateral (rename) move of a file test
PASS:  move_tests.py 2: sibling move of a file test
PASS:  move_tests.py 3: shallower move of a file test
PASS:  move_tests.py 4: deeper move of a file test
PASS:  move_tests.py 5: test property merging on move-update
PASS:  move_tests.py 6: move a missing directory
PASS:  move_tests.py 7: move many and delete-on-update
W: svn: E235000: In file '..\..\..\subversion\libsvn_wc\wc_db_update_move.c=
' line 809: assertion failed (move_dst_revision =3D=3D expected_move_dst_re=
vision || status =3D=3D svn_wc__db_status_not_present)
W:=20
W: This application has requested the Runtime to terminate it in an unusual=
 way.
W: Please contact the application's support team for more information.
W: CWD: D:\svn\src\Release\subversion\tests\cmdline
W: EXCEPTION: Failure: Command failed: "D:\svn\src\Release\subversion\svn\s=
vn.exe up svn-test-work\working_copies\move_tests-8 --accept ..."; exit cod=
e 3
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "d:\svn\src\subversion\tests\cmdline\svntest\main.py", line 1561, in=
 run
    rc =3D self.pred.run(sandbox)
  File "d:\svn\src\subversion\tests\cmdline\svntest\testcase.py", line 114,=
 in run
    return self._delegate.run(sandbox)
  File "d:\svn\src\subversion\tests\cmdline\svntest\testcase.py", line 176,=
 in run
    return self.func(sandbox)
  File "d:\svn\src\subversion\tests\cmdline\move_tests.py", line 1397, in m=
ove_many_update_add
    wc_dir, '--accept', 'mine-conflict')
  File "d:\svn\src\subversion\tests\cmdline\svntest\actions.py", line 865, =
in run_and_verify_update
    exit_code, output, errput =3D main.run_svn(error_re_string, 'up', *args=
)
  File "d:\svn\src\subversion\tests\cmdline\svntest\main.py", line 682, in =
run_svn
    *(_with_auth(_with_config_dir(varargs))))
  File "d:\svn\src\subversion\tests\cmdline\svntest\main.py", line 365, in =
run_command
    None, *varargs)
  File "d:\svn\src\subversion\tests\cmdline\svntest\main.py", line 557, in =
run_command_stdin
    '"; exit code ' + str(exit_code))
Failure: Command failed: "D:\svn\src\Release\subversion\svn\svn.exe up svn-=
test-work\working_copies\move_tests-8 --accept ..."; exit code 3
XFAIL: move_tests.py 8: move many and add-on-update
PASS:  move_tests.py 9: delete moved node, still a move
PASS:  move_tests.py 10: copy, move and commit
PASS:  move_tests.py 11: move to and from an external
PASS:  move_tests.py 12: move conflict markers
END: move_tests.py
ELAPSED: move_tests.py 0:01:02.563000

...which I now see is an XFAIL ~ but is the test still valid with the crash=
?

> In most cases you can ignore the wc-query-expectations error failure, whi=
ch
> only signals some performance loss. But it is hard to tell what failure y=
ou
> see if you only post the name of the .exe where one (or more) of the test=
s
> failed. The summary at the bottom is more valuable, and the test log
> contains the real details.
>=20
> 	Bert

Thanks for your reply and I hope I have provided all the necessary info now=
.  I will look to rebuild using a proper SQLite release as this is destined=
 for production (or should I wait for 1.9.0 with the r1672295 fix, do you h=
ave a target date for that yet?)

~ Mark C