Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-subversion-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-subversion-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 175E717318 for ; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 14:52:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 4662 invoked by uid 500); 24 Feb 2015 14:51:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-subversion-users-archive@subversion.apache.org Received: (qmail 4625 invoked by uid 500); 24 Feb 2015 14:51:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@subversion.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list users@subversion.apache.org Received: (qmail 4614 invoked by uid 99); 24 Feb 2015 14:51:54 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 14:51:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of David.Aldrich@emea.nec.com designates 85.115.52.190 as permitted sender) Received: from [85.115.52.190] (HELO cluster-a.mailcontrol.com) (85.115.52.190) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 14:51:27 +0000 Received: from mail1.neceur.com (mail1.neceur.com [195.47.207.3]) by rly04a.srv.mailcontrol.com (MailControl) with ESMTP id t1OEnLbi028925 for ; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 14:49:21 GMT Received: from intmail2.neceur.com (intmail2.neceur.com [172.29.177.11]) by mail1.neceur.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t1OEnLFq031086 for ; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 14:49:21 GMT Received: from av1.neceur.com (av1.neceur.com [172.29.14.21]) by intmail2.neceur.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id t1OEnLNX023519 for ; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 14:49:21 GMT Received: from av1.neceur.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA80 (Postfix) with ESMTP id E18B7296B7A for ; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 14:49:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from EX10CAS01.EU.NEC.COM (unknown [172.29.155.132]) by av1.neceur.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4103296B74 for ; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 14:49:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from EX10MBX02.EU.NEC.COM ([169.254.2.56]) by EX10CAS01.EU.NEC.COM ([172.29.155.132]) with mapi id 14.03.0210.002; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 14:49:20 +0000 From: David Aldrich To: "'users@subversion.apache.org' (users@subversion.apache.org)" Subject: Correct way to undo commit of a tag? Thread-Topic: Correct way to undo commit of a tag? Thread-Index: AdBQQMFbHzfMqEnoR4yMP2dZ4kdyLA== Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 14:49:19 +0000 Message-ID: <41302A7145AC054FA7A96CFD03835A0A0B945AEA@EX10MBX02.EU.NEC.COM> Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [172.29.68.112] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_41302A7145AC054FA7A96CFD03835A0A0B945AEAEX10MBX02EUNECC_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MailControl 37812.332 (www.mailcontrol.com) on 10.65.0.114 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --_000_41302A7145AC054FA7A96CFD03835A0A0B945AEAEX10MBX02EUNECC_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi My most recent commit was the creation of a tag. I want to delete that tag= . Should I reverse merge the commit or simply delete the tag? If I do a reverse merge I see a tree conflict: C:\>svn merge -c -69 --- Reverse-merging r69 into '.': C tags\TAG_ --- Recording mergeinfo for reverse merge of r69 into '.': U . Tree conflict on 'tags\TAG_ > local dir edit, incoming dir delete upon merge Select: (r) mark resolved, (p) postpone, (q) quit resolution, (h) help: What is the best thing to do here? Best regards David --_000_41302A7145AC054FA7A96CFD03835A0A0B945AEAEX10MBX02EUNECC_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi

 

My most recent commit was the creation of a tag.&nbs= p; I want to delete that tag.  Should I reverse merge the commit or si= mply delete the tag?

 

If I do a reverse merge I see a tree conflict:<= /o:p>

 

C:\>svn merge -c -69 <my url>

--- Reverse-merging r69 into '.':

   C tags\TAG_<snip>

--- Recording mergeinfo for reverse merge of r69 int= o '.':

U   .

Tree conflict on 'tags\TAG_<snip>

   > local dir edit, incoming dir delet= e upon merge

Select: (r) mark resolved, (p) postpone, (q) quit re= solution, (h) help:

 

What is the best thing to do here?

 

Best rega= rds

&nbs= p;

David

 

--_000_41302A7145AC054FA7A96CFD03835A0A0B945AEAEX10MBX02EUNECC_--