Mailing-List: contact users-help@subversion.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of mohsinchandia@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.220.181 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20141211000255.GR25318@ted.stsp.name>
References: <1418245277325-191202.post@n5.nabble.com>
	<5488BB92.90500@wandisco.com>
	<CAHFaGCqVFLbFnHk4znK3zwdPpS7EYhMCi_VFPPF9bF5f9G_VAw@mail.gmail.com>
	<1418252470920-191211.post@n5.nabble.com>
	<20141211000255.GR25318@ted.stsp.name>
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 00:13:15 +0000
Message-ID: 
 <CALL-kDchZYT6R8v_=jfSGayhZy80W1Fjrbyy21H=NWB9ASVe+A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: SVN Issue On Solaris OS
From: Mohsin Abbas <mohsinchandia@gmail.com>
To: Mohsin <mohsinchandia@gmail.com>, users <users@subversion.apache.org>,
	Stefan Sperling <stsp@elego.de>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec51b9c417977cf0509e5a400

--bcaec51b9c417977cf0509e5a400
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Thanks for your suggestion at least you have provided me a guide : )


Regards
Mohsin

On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 12:02 AM, Stefan Sperling <stsp@elego.de> wrote:

> On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 04:01:10PM -0700, Mohsin wrote:
> > >I searched the archives without luck, but thought I recall some people
> > posting these machines were not >good with SVN.
> >
> > If this is the case then we should consider Linux machines which are
> working
> > fine with svn . I think we should prefer Linux machines for svn.
> >
> >
> > Mohsin
>
> I'm running a T1000 and would say its disks are way slow to run a high
> perfomance svn server with. These machines are nice for running several
> network-bound services in isolated logical domains in a single box.
> But busy Subversion servers need fast disks. It's probably OK for a
> dozen users or so but beyond that I'd consider something else.
>
> BTW, if you ever end up replacing such servers and would like to donate
> them to an open source project instead of dumping them, please let me know
> :-)
>

--bcaec51b9c417977cf0509e5a400
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div><div>Thanks for your suggestion at least you have pro=
vided me a guide : )<br><br><br><br></div>Regards<br></div>Mohsin<br></div>=
<div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Thu, Dec 11, 2=
014 at 12:02 AM, Stefan Sperling <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:st=
sp@elego.de" target=3D"_blank">stsp@elego.de</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><bloc=
kquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #cc=
c solid;padding-left:1ex">On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 04:01:10PM -0700, Mohsin =
wrote:<br>
&gt; &gt;I searched the archives without luck, but thought I recall some pe=
ople<br>
&gt; posting these machines were not &gt;good with SVN.<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; If this is the case then we should consider Linux machines which are w=
orking<br>
&gt; fine with svn . I think we should prefer Linux machines for svn.<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; Mohsin<br>
<br>
I&#39;m running a T1000 and would say its disks are way slow to run a high<=
br>
perfomance svn server with. These machines are nice for running several<br>
network-bound services in isolated logical domains in a single box.<br>
But busy Subversion servers need fast disks. It&#39;s probably OK for a<br>
dozen users or so but beyond that I&#39;d consider something else.<br>
<br>
BTW, if you ever end up replacing such servers and would like to donate<br>
them to an open source project instead of dumping them, please let me know =
:-)<br>
</blockquote></div><br></div>

--bcaec51b9c417977cf0509e5a400--