From users-return-22619-apmail-subversion-users-archive=subversion.apache.org@subversion.apache.org Thu Dec 11 01:20:56 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-subversion-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-subversion-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8503410688 for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 01:20:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 82931 invoked by uid 500); 11 Dec 2014 01:20:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-subversion-users-archive@subversion.apache.org Received: (qmail 82899 invoked by uid 500); 11 Dec 2014 01:20:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@subversion.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list users@subversion.apache.org Received: (qmail 82140 invoked by uid 99); 11 Dec 2014 01:20:53 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 01:20:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: error (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.109.42.8] (HELO einhorn.in-berlin.de) (192.109.42.8) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 00:03:18 +0000 X-Envelope-From: stsp@elego.de Received: from ted.stsp.name (ted.stsp.name [217.197.84.34]) by einhorn.in-berlin.de (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4) with ESMTP id sBB02u8s020422 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 11 Dec 2014 01:02:56 +0100 Received: from localhost (ted.stsp.name [local]); by ted.stsp.name (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPA id fa1e7f44; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 01:02:55 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 01:02:55 +0100 From: Stefan Sperling To: Mohsin Cc: users@subversion.apache.org Subject: Re: SVN Issue On Solaris OS Message-ID: <20141211000255.GR25318@ted.stsp.name> Mail-Followup-To: Mohsin , users@subversion.apache.org References: <1418245277325-191202.post@n5.nabble.com> <5488BB92.90500@wandisco.com> <1418252470920-191211.post@n5.nabble.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1418252470920-191211.post@n5.nabble.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 04:01:10PM -0700, Mohsin wrote: > >I searched the archives without luck, but thought I recall some people > posting these machines were not >good with SVN. > > If this is the case then we should consider Linux machines which are working > fine with svn . I think we should prefer Linux machines for svn. > > > Mohsin I'm running a T1000 and would say its disks are way slow to run a high perfomance svn server with. These machines are nice for running several network-bound services in isolated logical domains in a single box. But busy Subversion servers need fast disks. It's probably OK for a dozen users or so but beyond that I'd consider something else. BTW, if you ever end up replacing such servers and would like to donate them to an open source project instead of dumping them, please let me know :-)