From users-return-19518-apmail-subversion-users-archive=subversion.apache.org@subversion.apache.org Wed Sep 4 17:52:58 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-subversion-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-subversion-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D4A5B1066E for ; Wed, 4 Sep 2013 17:52:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 34014 invoked by uid 500); 4 Sep 2013 17:52:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-subversion-users-archive@subversion.apache.org Received: (qmail 33897 invoked by uid 500); 4 Sep 2013 17:52:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@subversion.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list users@subversion.apache.org Received: (qmail 33880 invoked by uid 99); 4 Sep 2013 17:52:57 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 Sep 2013 17:52:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: error (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.215.181] (HELO mail-ea0-f181.google.com) (209.85.215.181) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 Sep 2013 17:52:51 +0000 Received: by mail-ea0-f181.google.com with SMTP id d10so364829eaj.12 for ; Wed, 04 Sep 2013 10:52:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:references:in-reply-to:subject:date :message-id:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :thread-index:content-language; bh=hgEYUqWhelW4mR74Zr1UiFBgX6b0YcaCoZmYvPI3qR0=; b=IYIXyn4QKJTmXv/sPxBva+ax15iHJI2EMtgY3SGQO8TibJF1j0nHG07KQCZJOG4oox Gdt7Z5UHeuxctXypQkTnNlGYKIDlfcecNJJqFC/qKl0wzYE1JbX9/Mp0iMJhMpB/mimV SfvD1Hm52pXh+RHNfo1t91JYu+EQ1EcCRnFtDxqVMb//Qz8Qxf99EtNI6O0pGGw3oAE6 XmoJHSyjytgj+CMXtsctk87CPWk8oLlsPMqXb/zsfrL1R5okU/dMVwezhGUqUhifwuKe BuYCFo2chubZpCi0TCc3mmpXmI1uB7HZ/bsyTIbyJ9nMrf2zmux8SbUdNX/h1aYTmxhL tGWw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQk5sKaB/h7jqCvYq6t/+CrVKbhr7AQoLTWaJTpv3NfrqpF6dQk3dvC4uR6pvRBBvz9SIuvg X-Received: by 10.14.224.198 with SMTP id x46mr5371974eep.53.1378317130725; Wed, 04 Sep 2013 10:52:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from i72600 ([2001:610:66e:0:59f6:6194:a164:dbd7]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id b45sm41916147eef.4.1969.12.31.16.00.00 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 04 Sep 2013 10:52:09 -0700 (PDT) From: "Bert Huijben" To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?'Thorsten_Sch=F6ning'?= , References: <1676465855.20130904122459@am-soft.de> <003401cea98a$175b1830$46114890$@qqmail.nl> In-Reply-To: <003401cea98a$175b1830$46114890$@qqmail.nl> Subject: RE: Problem Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2013 19:52:01 +0200 Message-ID: <005101cea997$7678ff00$636afd00$@qqmail.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 15.0 Thread-Index: AQHwQbf500t2TN/8qH+yDLAC/1TGcQKm2YknAWDM8w6ZUm4lYA== Content-Language: nl X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org > -----Original Message----- > From: Bert Huijben [mailto:bert@qqmail.nl] > Sent: woensdag 4 september 2013 18:16 > To: 'Thorsten Sch=F6ning'; users@subversion.apache.org > Subject: RE: Problem >=20 >=20 >=20 > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Thorsten Sch=F6ning [mailto:tschoening@am-soft.de] > > Sent: woensdag 4 september 2013 12:25 > > To: users@subversion.apache.org > > Subject: Re: Problem > > > > Guten Tag odd oddorks, > > am Mittwoch, 4. September 2013 um 09:33 schrieben Sie: > > > > > I think the problem derivate to the directory unaccessible because > > > if I elevate my user the problem do not exist anymore. > > [...] > > > The problem was not present on version 1.6.x > > > > I can't believe that a switch in your version of Subversion changes > > anything regarding access permissions in your working copy. = Subversion > > 1.8 could even be more compatible because it only needs write access > > to one svn folder. Are you really sure nothing else changed the > > permissions in your working copy? What do the permissions look like = at > > all? Where are the working copies stored, in your home directory or > > elsewhere? > > > > I have a restricted user myself and dozens of working copies and no > > problems with permissions. >=20 > Just a guess: >=20 > Do you have file externals in this working copy? >=20 > And if yes: Is one of these affected by the update? (Perhaps something = was > added in its place?) Or there is an explicit authz setting in the repository that nothing can = be added in its place? Bert=20