Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-subversion-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-subversion-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EAEDF1073F for ; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 18:18:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 28312 invoked by uid 500); 15 Aug 2013 18:16:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-subversion-users-archive@subversion.apache.org Received: (qmail 28147 invoked by uid 500); 15 Aug 2013 18:16:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@subversion.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list users@subversion.apache.org Received: (qmail 28084 invoked by uid 99); 15 Aug 2013 18:16:23 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 18:16:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of mpc8250@gmail.com designates 209.85.223.179 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.223.179] (HELO mail-ie0-f179.google.com) (209.85.223.179) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 18:16:14 +0000 Received: by mail-ie0-f179.google.com with SMTP id c11so1840376ieb.10 for ; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 11:15:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=x/bceJbMXq8jxGB2dJImXwOp70XHHrPUPpf1xorIyqg=; b=jmR3LpbWFHKKFKKb0D+62egq8tcmkT1Tt+NI8yT6R/UXHRfzN+iWbzOqIY6dbJC6la XBIe6+2R02U/ZpPUc2MAEWN+icMgI8nAWxo+afpd2XT2AfD5OEaBi3JRNQkk/5xt8nja FpCJf0E3t7lBon6vVk3HU6VwaxKjYcbk524nVtuA6/H/t1S7xWzO1+QTOXu/6ZVqsq21 mD2ljkjLE09vVuG5lGVnbURe1MOwPVDkLHhXveFzqAnf3615AHMCEpeTrJQ5UyhA7PTs erXJ9yvwVRmAOqDDI2Z0XFFeCaII37QiqHD2MpbvSjlS7CrFaRSnyvf0jwlup3R0pUqG PuZg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.42.84.69 with SMTP id k5mr25502icl.63.1376590552590; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 11:15:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.50.214.10 with HTTP; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 11:15:52 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 11:15:52 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: svn merge --reintegrate - quick question From: Z W To: "users@subversion.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=90e6ba614b32e379ab04e40076f9 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --90e6ba614b32e379ab04e40076f9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi All We have a situation where a few folks dont use --reintegrate option when performing svn merge, while others do. What's 1- the consequence of not using --reintegrate option; can the feature branch continue to svn merge to trunk the 2nd time and thereafter ? 2- the impact on those feature branches that do use --reintegrate option; from what we read in the manual, that one cannot use this feature branches anymore. Thanks Sincerely --90e6ba614b32e379ab04e40076f9 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi All


We have a s= ituation where a few folks dont use --reintegrate option when performing sv= n merge, while others do.

What's
1- the consequence of not using --reintegrate option; can the fe= ature branch continue to svn merge to trunk the 2nd time and thereafter ?
2- the impact on those feature branches that do use --reinte= grate option; from what we read in the manual, that one cannot use this fea= ture branches anymore.

Thanks
Sincerely=A0
--90e6ba614b32e379ab04e40076f9--