Mailing-List: contact users-help@subversion.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of jcorvel@gmail.com designates
 209.85.223.180 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAN5rfbR33n-rmWh_gds=y13xbPc584ToE5hUgxucR-Dn8RGsHw@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAN5rfbTd11wGX6r7_sdBdDoN8ByJt9UwUWFmcttjuemy+zk01A@mail.gmail.com>
 <51DA73D0.3080700@web.de>
 <CAN5rfbSm7quahn1VXyb4BdU2-u+CFZ0m6qRTSnbn_L_9nxG16g@mail.gmail.com>
 <51DA79EF.1020103@web.de>
 <CAN5rfbR33n-rmWh_gds=y13xbPc584ToE5hUgxucR-Dn8RGsHw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Johan Corveleyn <jcorvel@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2013 11:08:25 +0200
Message-ID: 
 <CAB84uBVMBcLhpXV1pU5AyGB1CAJnzS4LL0taqxLNh=Mcs_xzTQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Possible bug: svn update doesn't respect the 'depth' property
To: =?UTF-8?B?TWlybyBLcm9ww6HEjWVr?= <miro.kropacek@gmail.com>
Cc: Tobias Bading <tbading@web.de>,
	"users@subversion.apache.org" <users@subversion.apache.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Miro Krop=C3=A1=C4=8Dek <miro.kropacek@gma=
il.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 6:35 PM, Tobias Bading <tbading@web.de> wrote:
>>
>> You said you did an update yesterday, have you tried it with the latest
>> 1.7 Tortoise release and a fresh working copy?
>
>
> What I meant is that I'm not sure in which version I had tried this, I ca=
n't
> remember order of these two actions :) But I'll try tomorrow, with the
> latest (1.8 I believe) version, exactly the same thing as I'm describing =
in
> my first email, to be sure and report back.
>
> But I'm happy it's supposed to work and I didn't misunderstand something.
>

Also, check the version of the server. I think if you use a very old
server, that server might not fully understand the "depth" nuances. So
it's possible that this is just a back compat thing: the server will
send everything, and the client will filter it out client-side.

--
Johan