Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-subversion-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-subversion-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 166E9DFCC for ; Sun, 21 Oct 2012 06:33:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 7280 invoked by uid 500); 21 Oct 2012 06:33:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-subversion-users-archive@subversion.apache.org Received: (qmail 7048 invoked by uid 500); 21 Oct 2012 06:33:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@subversion.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list users@subversion.apache.org Received: (qmail 7001 invoked by uid 99); 21 Oct 2012 06:33:16 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 21 Oct 2012 06:33:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ravi.aroy@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.171 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.220.171] (HELO mail-vc0-f171.google.com) (209.85.220.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 21 Oct 2012 06:33:08 +0000 Received: by mail-vc0-f171.google.com with SMTP id m18so2401468vcm.16 for ; Sat, 20 Oct 2012 23:32:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=/7sPVCKyZ6AaumOxezdiSRESpD/MvuqIyn6MS5wAKUE=; b=xDrK3DC/HGSV6O0Ux2ahro8WRD+jRLVdfiWiW00LTahA2FIOy2B1NSmN+ZDg/Px9d2 /fNx1EJO7nj3puEo3qD7bhigETiw6mdIlqYF0j1TQbh0dHG+U8CGcvdZaeu6F5UbTjlV 3F8HeVszA4Gt8Crkb2SnxhEvduA48ZlFIlFYmU/77Z3XXdSyF2jXCsJ8a0mrVgiInwDB wj0T4ELLq8GLvyiJkW7MTQGzfsXXEHCb52gpfCqzBGaYPaXkpUJeoXY6MoyOd/48+qBB +439rhOoLNyf6sBrWk4e3HtBZOrtmImWPEmGzA/5Rfkv3KJkBG+BbuiYMXVZKZNZdn7k 0FWg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.58.145.161 with SMTP id sv1mr4914558veb.52.1350801167670; Sat, 20 Oct 2012 23:32:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.1.133 with HTTP; Sat, 20 Oct 2012 23:32:47 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2012 12:02:47 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Advice on migration from 32 bit platform to 64 bit From: Ravi Roy To: users@subversion.apache.org Cc: Ravi Roy Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi Everyone, I have one master and two write-through proxy running on CentOS 5.4, LDAP, Apache httpd 2.2.21 with Subversion 1.6.1 -- 32 bit. Becuase of memory requirements and efficient use of hardware resource pool, I plan to migrate to 64 bit OS and rest of the stuff. Is there a possiblity of incompatibilities between 32 bit sqlite and 64 bit sqlite in terms of migration of repositories? Just want to have the experiences of everyone before I go ahead with the same. Or would be better if anything is known which may break in this scenario. I plan to migrate to CentOS 5.8, Apache httpd 2.2.23, OpenLDAP 2.4.33 and Subversion 1.6.18. I normally do not use pre-compiled binaries but compile and install Apache httpd, Subversion, OpenLDAP from source myself. Thanks in advance for sharing experiences! Ravi