From users-return-16510-apmail-subversion-users-archive=subversion.apache.org@subversion.apache.org Sun Oct 21 20:58:52 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-subversion-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-subversion-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1EABAD8E7 for ; Sun, 21 Oct 2012 20:58:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 19065 invoked by uid 500); 21 Oct 2012 20:58:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-subversion-users-archive@subversion.apache.org Received: (qmail 19037 invoked by uid 500); 21 Oct 2012 20:58:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@subversion.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list users@subversion.apache.org Received: (qmail 19030 invoked by uid 99); 21 Oct 2012 20:58:51 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 21 Oct 2012 20:58:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [66.111.4.25] (HELO out1-smtp.messagingengine.com) (66.111.4.25) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 21 Oct 2012 20:58:43 +0000 Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.46]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40918201AB; Sun, 21 Oct 2012 16:58:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend2.nyi.mail.srv.osa ([10.202.2.161]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 21 Oct 2012 16:58:23 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= daniel.shahaf.name; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to; s=mesmtp; bh=pDI7xn07uSIkaTFehabtg0/vYyY=; b=m+F0k 14og1cg5NBtsb2/9RBKE/Eyw2fCCnP7mLhNpyUWTd4UzPrff2fAWhG3XZ1Eo8jqX zR3IRihFmAvFIRf/yLqfsZ5HwLb+9N5Ko+JEgdmrU7u+2DL7xT6tfMRJCmRJ1kkf zKK7KFjj4q6U+nbanhKOngteXynI/9pIC80ziM= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to; s=smtpout; bh=pDI7xn07uSIkaTFehabtg0/vYyY=; b=oH+J jgYQtEmf4HHnajpl/0qzsf0vqUkXo+HG36K8g15dhparjckwY2fSv45y64EK8ZpV tE059NpoDWolno2YA0lsPisamMG3vI6QXoLZ+L0uO1UVZ/+80SGJP0deEs5wCEQp RZr1zqZdddCgHk4mDaG7NS6OdBUWC/w5D+K/K90= X-Sasl-enc: ZON9IOHQ7GzGy6NaiXeo66eWYDIDw0Htm4+mjUdJLuS/ 1350853102 Received: from lp-shahaf.local (unknown [79.179.216.75]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 64131482507; Sun, 21 Oct 2012 16:58:22 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2012 22:58:18 +0200 From: Daniel Shahaf To: Thorsten =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sch=F6ning?= Cc: users@subversion.apache.org Subject: Re: Advice on migration from 32 bit platform to 64 bit Message-ID: <20121021205818.GO2941@lp-shahaf.local> References: <486723609.20121021090107@am-soft.de> <535391179.20121021103553@am-soft.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <535391179.20121021103553@am-soft.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Thorsten Schöning wrote on Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 10:35:53 +0200: > Guten Tag Ravi Roy, > am Sonntag, 21. Oktober 2012 um 10:11 schrieben Sie: > > >>> It depends on the Subversion repository backend. > > My repository backend is FSFS. > > So, do you mean I can go ahead safely without worring anything known? > > I really don't know, but my quoted answer is form Stefan Sperling, one > of the Subversion core developers and if he says you don't have to > worry, I wouldn't. :-) You should. Stefan's post was written more than one minor version ago (when 1.6.x was the latest release). The sort of safety/unsafety issues discussed in this thread might change between minor versions. (Now, as it happens, between 1.6 and 1.7 in FSFS they didn't. But they did in 1.5, 1.6, and 1.8.)