Mailing-List: contact users-help@subversion.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy)
Envelope-To: users@subversion.apache.org
Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2012 12:25:05 +0200
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Thorsten_Sch=F6ning?= <tschoening@am-soft.de>
Organization: AM-SoFT IT-Systeme
Message-ID: <348445429.20120802122505@am-soft.de>
To: users@subversion.apache.org
Subject: Re: Can the mergeinfo of a reintegrate-merge be ignored?
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAAuEXnj8C7mF_QzCCLV+5GSL_T=hTGxbTxfSaHQ-WJ23HG7iWA@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAAuEXnj8C7mF_QzCCLV+5GSL_T=hTGxbTxfSaHQ-WJ23HG7iWA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Guten Tag Martin Bischoff,
am Donnerstag, 2. August 2012 um 11:12 schrieben Sie:

> Since it is recommended to delete feature-branches after they were
> reintegrated, why should this mergeinfo be kept?

Because there are scenarios where feature branches aren't deleted or
even branched under the same name again for whatever reason. If you
don't ever do that, ignore the merge info, but why bother unless
performance is reduced or something?

> Wouldn't that property
> then be propagated to each and every future (feature-)branch and tag?

I think Subversion should be able to handle this in any case.

Mit freundlichen Gr=FC=DFen,

Thorsten Sch=F6ning

--=20
Thorsten Sch=F6ning       E-Mail:Thorsten.Schoening@AM-SoFT.de
AM-SoFT IT-Systeme      http://www.AM-SoFT.de/

Telefon.............030-2 1001-310
Fax...............05151-  9468- 88
Mobil..............0178-8 9468- 04

AM-SoFT GmbH IT-Systeme, Brandenburger Str. 7c, 31789 Hameln
AG Hanover HRB 207 694 - Gesch=E4ftsf=FChrer: Andreas Muchow