From users-return-15792-apmail-subversion-users-archive=subversion.apache.org@subversion.apache.org Wed Aug 8 17:15:21 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-subversion-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-subversion-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 21B55DBCE for ; Wed, 8 Aug 2012 17:15:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 19386 invoked by uid 500); 8 Aug 2012 17:15:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-subversion-users-archive@subversion.apache.org Received: (qmail 19365 invoked by uid 500); 8 Aug 2012 17:15:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@subversion.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list users@subversion.apache.org Received: (qmail 19358 invoked by uid 99); 8 Aug 2012 17:15:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Aug 2012 17:15:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of lesmikesell@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.41 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.41] (HELO mail-wg0-f41.google.com) (74.125.82.41) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Aug 2012 17:15:15 +0000 Received: by wgbds1 with SMTP id ds1so3471337wgb.4 for ; Wed, 08 Aug 2012 10:14:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=1C2M+jZNY0h91J50deveOlN0NGSSVASmDR4jdr3Ka8Q=; b=Q4sQQzoMWcwzHpq0P0Rkd654AUkLaLT5KW25QfUlrEo9QIiGE8lqw4LeXFPla7gR8d IbxPorpHhdG5+WdKWkgxQmMMt371bIxcEjnvHkLDKT1sPfRQJ01XulxDrYIN/2CdNFM/ A6Z3z1iUqNIuhpRUGxvwSSVnYROTMLzP2Xf/Taq4LblHCX2v9E37CVyl9EqIzeCBzkK/ 75KkeQErzAERqYKTdGZuYFOx4aubP3fLuMFe2srS8MmcYFunjXTGPzWE5kwnKGRyTeca NFTTGq/m93m+JTn9ZkWRw0O+x3mYm6MwlDXxG9DGFhIFd80Whb/WHtGk6Uktsx4O6HXB 9c4A== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.73.180 with SMTP id m20mr1739513wiv.19.1344446093563; Wed, 08 Aug 2012 10:14:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.169.11 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Aug 2012 10:14:53 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5876CF7B7F6E2D48B01C8CB7C3B46C3A0C4A881C@scrvm-ex01.st-claire.org> References: <5876CF7B7F6E2D48B01C8CB7C3B46C3A0C4A85EF@scrvm-ex01.st-claire.org> <5876CF7B7F6E2D48B01C8CB7C3B46C3A0C4A87CD@scrvm-ex01.st-claire.org> <5876CF7B7F6E2D48B01C8CB7C3B46C3A0C4A881C@scrvm-ex01.st-claire.org> Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2012 12:14:53 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Install SVN from YUM, change Sqlite3 library path From: Les Mikesell To: "Tilsley, Jerry M." Cc: "users@subversion.apache.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Tilsley, Jerry M. wrote: > > Sorry, I'm going by a Centos install which is usually the same but > maybe there is some difference. On Centos, sqlite 3.6.20 is the > current stock version and what other packages should expect. I'd > look at the problem the other way and figure out why your other user has > something out of date in his library path. > > The user has an out of date package because the user and package are part of > a large data interfacing system for a hospital. I would like for that user > to be able to check scripts in, but because of the vendor system relies on > the older version of sqlite, the user has to use that version. Linux itself is relatively flexible about library paths and multiple versions of things, but the RPM packaging system generally just wants to manage a single version at a time on a machine (with a few exceptions). Some brute-force solutions would be to recompile from source, either with a static linkage to the current library or on the target machine against the outdated libs. Or copy the current .so file over to some other path that you would add to LD_LIBRARY_PATH in the environment when running svn. Or if you don't care about branch tracking, you might compile a 1.5 version from source that would not have the library requirement but still has wire-protocol compatibility. -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell@gmail.com