From users-return-15860-apmail-subversion-users-archive=subversion.apache.org@subversion.apache.org Fri Aug 17 08:59:27 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-subversion-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-subversion-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4CBBAD9DF for ; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 08:59:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 4334 invoked by uid 500); 17 Aug 2012 08:59:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-subversion-users-archive@subversion.apache.org Received: (qmail 4220 invoked by uid 500); 17 Aug 2012 08:59:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@subversion.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list users@subversion.apache.org Received: (qmail 4122 invoked by uid 99); 17 Aug 2012 08:59:24 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 08:59:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [66.111.4.29] (HELO out5-smtp.messagingengine.com) (66.111.4.29) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 08:59:17 +0000 Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.44]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96CA920B24; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 04:58:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend1.nyi.mail.srv.osa ([10.202.2.160]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 17 Aug 2012 04:58:56 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= daniel.shahaf.name; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=mesmtp; bh= AdKduIYOT5nrR73PUaObfO0oza0=; b=I9ripyTgKKt0tEeisi2QJx3I4hPF1T3D 3jlU+uEUivsQy3/hVGv2rd8NG6303p0t82HX52ukFAhN35QqIrbuZEfvDMXH5MS0 Z1OdgtpZ2+kxe5Wt+1sY+lRTtvOO3U6eYyKB2Xk04lo51NQiLmuMg7pQc2mL+cSS 9T04zuSy6dw= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=smtpout; bh=AdKduIYOT5nrR73PUaObfO0oza0=; b=IdIgXysByusO7hFPAGsC3C8RjZm0 56Eij4KcKzG3HXZopN6UksVWGMBsb6Rtuz0bLAgpHh+e6yXdjZ65VSwbhGPflmg8 dvzRigsz3uyJn6j2Qxw2KZW0eAHlHuwAzSDwlLo1W/Qa5Y3PPnMBwimPxWacGhdl 0AE2p973TWh7mOY= X-Sasl-enc: EaKaeKJ8HLYrawa3FKvQkHPfw3Sg2blFKGv16vmyRmIa 1345193936 Received: from tarsus.local2 (unknown [128.232.130.71]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 1752D8E01FC; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 04:58:56 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 09:58:54 +0100 From: Daniel Shahaf To: Nico Kadel-Garcia Cc: Subversion Subject: Re: mod_dontdothat RPM building problems with subversion-1.7.6 Message-ID: <20120817085854.GC17342@tarsus.local2> References: <20120816225526.GA13364@tarsus.local2> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote on Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 23:13:12 -0400: > On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 10:38 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 6:55 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > >> If you want to add targets to install individual tools, too, I imagine > >> we would welcome a patch for this (but I won't have time to handle it > >> myself). See the 1.7.5->1.7.6 diff for most of the files you'll need to > >> touch (makefile.ezt and co). > > > > That's potentially useful, but doens't fix the problem where the built > > components are in "tools" are > > Gahh, got cut off and hit the wrong key. The built components in the > "tools" directory include a number of binaries, not appropriate to > docs, and filtering out what should go in in "docs" after it's already > built is awkward. What I can do easily is a hack in the .spec file: I'm not sure where the "docs" (tree directory, or makefile target) factors in. In any case, any issues with the makefile targets and suggestions for modifying them are be on-topic for dev@; feel free to start a thread there outlining the issues and/or suggestions you have. > replicate "tools" to "tools-doc" before compilation, and include > "tools-doc" as documentation for a distinct "tools" package that also > includes the binaries intalled with 'make instlal-toole". It's a bit > funky, but will generate a clean build.