subversion-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Daniel Shahaf <...@daniel.shahaf.name>
Subject Re: mod_dontdothat RPM building problems with subversion-1.7.6
Date Fri, 17 Aug 2012 08:55:29 GMT
Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote on Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 22:38:54 -0400:
> On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 6:55 PM, Daniel Shahaf <d.s@daniel.shahaf.name> wrote:
> > Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote on Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 01:31:11 -0400:
> >> On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 7:52 AM, Philip Martin <philip@apache.org> wrote:
> >> > I'm happy to announce the release of Apache Subversion 1.7.6.
> >> > Please choose the mirror closest to you by visiting:
> >> >
> >> >     http://subversion.apache.org/download/#recommended-release
> >>
> >> Cool. I'm poking at getting a 1.7.6 SRPM set up for it. I am noticing an issue.
> >>
> >
> > In the future you may consider testing the packaging when the tarballs
> > are posted for developer testing, rather than only after their public
> > release.  (at which point they can no longer be pulled)
> 
> Sorry, Daniel: I was busy on one contract until July 31 and just
> started a new one Monday.
> 

Congratulations then :-)  No need to apologise --- just wanted to be
sure you knew that reporting bugs during the dev testing phase allows us
to pull the release before if necessary.

> >> * Make mod_dontdothat.so installable from the Makefile. The easiest
> >> way to do it is to move it to from "tools" to "subversion", parallel
> >> to subverson/mod_dav_svn, and as a loadable httpd module, it requires
> >> special attention.
> >>
> >> * Make the other Subversion tools installable. It should be
> >> straightforward to make the other contents of the "tools" directory
> >> compiled and instlalled into the 'toolsdir', typically
> >> /usr/local/bin/svn-tools, defined in the Makefile.in. It's not
> >> currently used in subverson-1.7.x, but is used in the trunk for the
> >> "svnmucc" tools.
> >
> > Are you aware of 'make install-tools'?
> 
> I looked in the Makefile and didn't see it, unlike 'install-man",
> "install-swig-rb", etc. But sure enough, it works. Gotta love
> sophisticated and impliciit components of Makefiles. Thanks for the
> pointer!
> 

I think install-tools is defined in build-outputs.mk (which is generated
by build/generator/, and included by Makefile).

> Is there some reason it's not included in the default "install" list of targets?
> 

Mime
View raw message