Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-subversion-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-subversion-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 63F219153 for ; Wed, 4 Apr 2012 20:11:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 59318 invoked by uid 500); 4 Apr 2012 20:11:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-subversion-users-archive@subversion.apache.org Received: (qmail 59295 invoked by uid 500); 4 Apr 2012 20:11:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@subversion.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list users@subversion.apache.org Received: (qmail 59288 invoked by uid 99); 4 Apr 2012 20:11:50 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 Apr 2012 20:11:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_SOFTFAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: softfail (nike.apache.org: transitioning domain of btv1==4419d0be70b==DReed@cmal.com does not designate 72.166.44.29 as permitted sender) Received: from [72.166.44.29] (HELO barracuda2.cmal.com) (72.166.44.29) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 Apr 2012 20:11:44 +0000 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1333570282-181c032f0000-SaVkaQ X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1333570282-181c032f0000-SaVkaQ X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1333570282-181c032f0000-SaVkaQ X-Barracuda-URL: http://192.168.12.12:8000/cgi-bin/mark.cgi X-ASG-Whitelist: Client Received: from EXCHCASHT02.cmrgcorp.cmrginc.com (unknown [192.168.12.171]) by barracuda2.cmal.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id A199D5825D8; Wed, 4 Apr 2012 16:11:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: from EXCHCASHT02.cmrgcorp.cmrginc.com ([192.168.12.171]) by barracuda2.cmal.com with ESMTP id IsCW55Cs8TCCkcVx; Wed, 04 Apr 2012 16:11:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: from EXCHMB02.cmrgcorp.cmrginc.com ([fe80::2552:b572:3cbd:1b9a]) by EXCHCASHT02.cmrgcorp.cmrginc.com ([fe80::6ca0:11dd:8791:6a09%15]) with mapi id 14.01.0355.002; Wed, 4 Apr 2012 16:11:22 -0400 From: "Reed, David" To: 'Les Mikesell' CC: Andy Levy , "users@subversion.apache.org" X-ASG-Orig-Subj: RE: Update fails to delete a line of code Subject: RE: Update fails to delete a line of code Thread-Topic: Update fails to delete a line of code Thread-Index: Ac0SkgPK1qM4gUVvSkmVnGquKg/8QAAI0Q2AAAhSryD//80yAIAAQMgA///FuwCAAEMPwA== Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2012 20:11:21 +0000 Message-ID: <1FF4EEEE6CA0C641848F6412E887CE022C4B5477@EXCHMB02.cmrgcorp.cmrginc.com> References: <1FF4EEEE6CA0C641848F6412E887CE022C4B52F0@EXCHMB02.cmrgcorp.cmrginc.com> <1FF4EEEE6CA0C641848F6412E887CE022C4B5358@EXCHMB02.cmrgcorp.cmrginc.com> <1FF4EEEE6CA0C641848F6412E887CE022C4B5445@EXCHMB02.cmrgcorp.cmrginc.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [192.168.18.41] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Barracuda-Connect: UNKNOWN[192.168.12.171] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1333570282 X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by OUTBOUND SPAM FIREWALL at cmal.com Thank you, very much, for your help. -----Original Message----- From: Les Mikesell [mailto:lesmikesell@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2012 4:10 PM To: Reed, David Cc: Andy Levy; users@subversion.apache.org Subject: Re: Update fails to delete a line of code On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 2:59 PM, Reed, David wrote: > Unfortunately, I can't answer that. I did it last week, and this was my = first chance to ask about it on the list. Being under pressure to make it = work, I ended up bypassing TortoiseSVN to force through my change, and so n= o longer have good forensic evidence. > > I thought perhaps there was a known issue that someone on the list would = be familiar with. > > If it happens again, I'll try to document it better. My sincere apologie= s! For a really quick fix, I would have renamed the old file or moved it out of the directory and done the update again. That would ensure a new copy that exactly matched the repository version. But, the only reason you shouldn't have gotten that in the first place would have been uncommitted local modifications that conflicted. -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell@gmail.com Confidentiality Note: This e-mail, and any attachment to it, contains privi= leged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individ= ual(s) or entity named on the e-mail. If the reader of this e-mail is not t= he intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering = it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that reading it is st= rictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immedi= ately return it to the sender and delete it from your system. Thank you.