From users-return-14424-apmail-subversion-users-archive=subversion.apache.org@subversion.apache.org Mon Apr 2 14:18:47 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-subversion-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-subversion-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 617249298 for ; Mon, 2 Apr 2012 14:18:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 59674 invoked by uid 500); 2 Apr 2012 14:18:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-subversion-users-archive@subversion.apache.org Received: (qmail 59651 invoked by uid 500); 2 Apr 2012 14:18:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@subversion.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list users@subversion.apache.org Received: (qmail 59643 invoked by uid 99); 2 Apr 2012 14:18:46 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Apr 2012 14:18:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [66.111.4.25] (HELO out1-smtp.messagingengine.com) (66.111.4.25) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Apr 2012 14:18:40 +0000 Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.45]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C3A220A08; Mon, 2 Apr 2012 10:18:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend1.nyi.mail.srv.osa ([10.202.2.160]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 02 Apr 2012 10:18:20 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= daniel.shahaf.name; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=mesmtp; bh= XEVcAfE90kFxJXCugnTXj9J7fX8=; b=T5tJ/Vd7Y6wparREqFLDYHOdy1r+CFzM QEEzxtjtB2dIE5KP3NlbpzLU3TptZtYgAIfuGVfa4xkpUhO79L+95bVyGeCx+eEX 5lPg9o/YVIUtWqLgzLVlwAkPQ68NgaSvJ172gbdfd6PiKYKWH/NSXzhFyDHba/WW HNVF0x/oKBI= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=smtpout; bh=XEVcAfE90kFxJXCugnTXj9J7fX8=; b=hhoJ6Xeh/q9Rm+Zd3vzQWarZx5dw qr3uVnigh//xSK9OvGtyF0oV1NKd+LRdCoJeqCMGaLbo/uon5U8yICRhupPOyar9 X+HRSTugCgznOKu5DOwD3uvyQ3j3d6qixd2hiaJemY5NvOjnupp8/SVQjgqWYpWw bi3oNJFjd6HfxEE= X-Sasl-enc: 1qsy1PsjydNcFZTMQRHM/tjQgpH1p72TQwoNQ6jdq7i2/7dgDjCJiZHv45rIHA 1333376299 Received: from daniel3.local (bzq-79-180-206-85.red.bezeqint.net [79.180.206.85]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 34D918E0263; Mon, 2 Apr 2012 10:18:19 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2012 17:18:11 +0300 From: Daniel Shahaf To: Gary Cc: "users@subversion.apache.org" Subject: Re: svnsync: Error while replaying commit Message-ID: <20120402141811.GC4711@daniel3.local> References: <1333113928.4211.YahooMailNeo@web28507.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1333113928.4211.YahooMailNeo@web28507.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Haven't read the whole thread, but the problem here has to do with r81. r80 moved fine and I expect `svnlook youngest dest` = 80. If the source repos has authz set up or has undergone history surgeries that's likely related. You could try running: % svnserve --log-file=foo.log -dr. % svnsync sync svn://localhost to get a "destination server" log. Gary wrote on Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 14:25:28 +0100: > I see a lot of reports of this error, but little in the way of > clear information as to what it might mean, or how to fix it: > > $ svnsync sync file://`pwd`/dest > Committed revision 1. > Copied properties for revision 1. > Transmitting file data ..................... > [...] > Committed revision 79. > Copied properties for revision 79. > Transmitting file data ....................... > Committed revision 80. > Copied properties for revision 80. > svnsync: Error while replaying commit > > Huh? > > If I look at the source server log, revs 81 & 82 are "missing" > in the trunk. I imagine they are/were in a branch, which AFAIK > is no longer available. Is there any way to get around this? > Assuming that's the problem, of course. >