Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-subversion-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-subversion-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8D3079DB5 for ; Thu, 2 Feb 2012 15:57:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 77660 invoked by uid 500); 2 Feb 2012 15:57:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-subversion-users-archive@subversion.apache.org Received: (qmail 77623 invoked by uid 500); 2 Feb 2012 15:57:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@subversion.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list users@subversion.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for users@subversion.apache.org Received: (qmail 62964 invoked by uid 99); 2 Feb 2012 15:52:53 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of samuel.johnson@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.171 as permitted sender) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=pqd3PJIJaP6oidbjFUFkFVDD/iEilIK7jx4wkMxmUIw=; b=MkhD6qQlu0sxzDzxmrPS+KAMWBsoLEl5IhaZb9pUYMU+MZK/N1CmJMdaUtN3raouUt 01Lj0X+qAOAe+2t7DhADqcTduz8wXrVfoIAkwYDS9UQ6steLaLbtBHiYbKqOeXLdheBo 9JEyXuk0MLgqZQCopN0a1JxTmBdY6A0JWLxtA= MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Sam Johnson Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2012 10:52:06 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Does 'svnamin load' invalidate existing working directories? To: users@subversion.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=14dae9340f7dc7a3aa04b7fd2e9b --14dae9340f7dc7a3aa04b7fd2e9b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I recently used svn dump / svndumpfilter to extract a partial path from one repository. The dump was created successfully, and I dropped empty revs and renumbered revs. I used 'svnadmin load --ignore-uid MyRepo < test.dump' to load the dump into an existing repository. The repo had 19 revisions before I started and svnadmin load ran successfully, reporting the addition of 5 revisions. if I go to an existing working directory for this repo and and run update, it reports "At revision 19", instead of updating to revision 24. Using the TortoiseSVN repository browser on this working directory, I don't see any evidence of my loaded changes. However, If I checkout the repository into a new working folder, it correctly reports all 24 revisions, and the TortoiseSVN repository browser shows all 24 revisions. Is this expected behavior? Do I have to tell my users to delete their working copies, and re-check-out, if I run svnadmin load? Sam --14dae9340f7dc7a3aa04b7fd2e9b Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I recently used svn dump / svndumpfilter to extract a partial path from one= repository. The dump was created=A0successfully, and I dropped empty revs = and renumbered revs.

I used 'svnadmin load --ignore-= uid MyRepo < test.dump' to load the dump into an existing repository= . The repo had 19 revisions before I started and svnadmin load ran successf= ully, reporting the addition of 5 revisions.

if I go to an existing working directory for this repo = and and run update, it reports "At revision 19", instead of updat= ing to revision 24. Using the TortoiseSVN repository browser on this workin= g directory, I don't see any evidence of my loaded changes. However, If= I checkout the repository into a new working folder, it correctly reports = all 24 revisions, and the TortoiseSVN repository browser shows all 24 revis= ions.

Is this expected behavior? Do I have to tell my users t= o delete their working copies, and re-check-out, if I run svnadmin load?

Sam
--14dae9340f7dc7a3aa04b7fd2e9b--