Mailing-List: contact users-help@subversion.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of knst.kolinko@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.212.43 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAO=79VYQ-YTB5w5HkyZoUoZhnf8KmoSQ9SA2LgbAg50vJVe+pg@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAO=79VYQ-YTB5w5HkyZoUoZhnf8KmoSQ9SA2LgbAg50vJVe+pg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2012 23:48:34 +0400
Message-ID: 
 <CABzHfV=6fLLGqRE5E2MyaN8j_os-jF9V4D=eh1fv_EbUbQNvXw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Does 'svnamin load' invalidate existing working directories?
From: Konstantin Kolinko <knst.kolinko@gmail.com>
To: Sam Johnson <samuel.johnson@gmail.com>
Cc: users@subversion.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

2012/2/2 Sam Johnson <samuel.johnson@gmail.com>:
> I recently used svn dump / svndumpfilter to extract a partial path from o=
ne
> repository. The dump was created=A0successfully, and I dropped empty revs=
 and
> renumbered revs.
>
> I used 'svnadmin load --ignore-uid MyRepo < test.dump' to load the dump i=
nto
> an existing repository. The repo had 19 revisions before I started and
> svnadmin load ran successfully, reporting the addition of 5 revisions.
>
> if I go to an existing working directory for this repo and and run update=
,
> it reports "At revision 19", instead of updating to revision 24. Using th=
e
> TortoiseSVN repository browser on this working directory, I don't see any
> evidence of my loaded changes. However, If I checkout the repository into=
 a
> new working folder, it correctly reports all 24 revisions, and the
> TortoiseSVN repository browser shows all 24 revisions.
>
> Is this expected behavior? Do I have to tell my users to delete their
> working copies, and re-check-out, if I run svnadmin load?
>

It should not happen. The "svn up" command should have been updated
that wc to rev.24. There is no need to create a new checkout.

Maybe that wc was looking at a different repository (e.g. to a backup
copy of the original one)? That would explain the thing.

What versions of software are you using?

Best regards,
Konstantin Kolinko