Mailing-List: contact users-help@subversion.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of Johan.Holmberg@iar.com
 designates 193.58.238.150 as permitted sender)
Message-ID: <4F2BFBF7.3090005@iar.se>
Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2012 16:23:35 +0100
From: Johan Holmberg <holmberg@iar.se>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
 rv:8.0) Gecko/20111124 Thunderbird/8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "users@subversion.apache.org" <users@subversion.apache.org>
Subject: Re: Strange diffs after rsync copying of  working copy
References: <4F2BC96D.2020902@iar.se> <20120203122811.GB18533@ted.stsp.name>
 <4F2BD9E0.2070809@iar.se> <87wr84kqs1.fsf@stat.home.lan>
 <4F2BE1AA.8040409@iar.se> <87liokkour.fsf@stat.home.lan>
 <4F2BE986.5070106@iar.se> <20120203142318.GB5807@ted.stsp.name>
In-Reply-To: <20120203142318.GB5807@ted.stsp.name>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 02/03/2012 03:23 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 03:04:54PM +0100, Johan Holmberg wrote:
>> On 02/03/2012 02:50 PM, Philip Martin wrote:
>>> I have now done some further experiments. I just issued commands like this:
>>>
>>>      $ svn status              # no modified files reported
>>> Subversion is not doing a full text comparison because the timestamps
>>> match.  So the difference that is present is not reported.
>> But this occurs right after a fresh "svn checkout". There can be no
>> differences.
> You said these differences were always due to keyword expansion
> or eol-style. Can you describe in more detail what the related
> svn: property settings are, and how file content differs from
> what you expect?

See my previous mail (the reply to Philip Martin).


>
>> To be really sure, I saved the file before/after my "touch + svn
>> status". The working copy file is identical before and after. But
>> first it is reported as unmodified and then as modified.
>>
>> Seems like a bug.
> It may well be. But we've stopped fixing bugs in the 1.6 working copy
> implementation long ago. 1.6 receives fixes only for critical data
> corruption issues for which no workaround exists, and security fixes.
> Does the issue exist in Subversion 1.7?
>

I would like to try it with Subversion 1.7. How do I get a binary for 
Ubuntu 10.10 or 11.10? I couldn't find any precompiled packages easily. 
Or do I have to build it from source?

/Johan Holmberg