Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-subversion-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-subversion-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 344059ED1 for ; Wed, 2 Nov 2011 14:46:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 9376 invoked by uid 500); 2 Nov 2011 14:46:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-subversion-users-archive@subversion.apache.org Received: (qmail 9358 invoked by uid 500); 2 Nov 2011 14:46:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@subversion.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list users@subversion.apache.org Received: (qmail 9351 invoked by uid 99); 2 Nov 2011 14:46:52 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Nov 2011 14:46:52 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of markphip@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.43 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.43] (HELO mail-fx0-f43.google.com) (209.85.161.43) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Nov 2011 14:46:47 +0000 Received: by faat9 with SMTP id t9so880554faa.16 for ; Wed, 02 Nov 2011 07:46:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=UbwwnBnZu2plJNm+Ac9qCtl0KCWD+95pkVe/KmyheJg=; b=NVYJDc5IU5ajc7CChSKnoyBpk6gSfmjawnkeRufaK20lpmJLlrXIYMKkXdBM3XLrW3 oFsFWsmBzTgdyL9WmWvDbNCBG6+JT6lAXWjEPPHWxvW/fex1/T+FFL9OVvVTAC7PItNV DA1yokZj/Za73eeWdpSZdLUAMwqVOHXnPsdo4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.85.139 with SMTP id o11mr9043007fal.0.1320245186457; Wed, 02 Nov 2011 07:46:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.152.24.225 with HTTP; Wed, 2 Nov 2011 07:46:26 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4EB1560F.1080709@elego.de> References: <20111101084921.GB32398@ted.stsp.name> <20111101143505.GE32398@ted.stsp.name> <20111101170007.GG32398@ted.stsp.name> <20111101172147.GH32398@ted.stsp.name> <20111101180056.GJ32398@ted.stsp.name> <8739e7vgpk.fsf@stat.home.lan> <20111101184029.GL32398@ted.stsp.name> <4EB1560F.1080709@elego.de> Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2011 10:46:26 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Apparent "svn rm" scaling problem in 1.7.x From: Mark Phippard To: Neels J Hofmeyr Cc: Philip Martin , michael_rytting@agilent.com, users@subversion.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0ce0f7b45af0bd04b0c18949 --000e0ce0f7b45af0bd04b0c18949 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 10:39 AM, Neels J Hofmeyr wrote: > > It seems to show an improvement on 'svn delete' for 1.7.0. > Yep, I noticed that. FWIW, the benchmarks that I wrote also show delete being faster with 1.7.x: https://ctf.open.collab.net/sf/projects/csvn/ In my case, delete is deleting a folder that contains a lot of files. Perhaps we need a test that is doing: $ svn rm folder/* That seems to be the main area where there is a problem. What does your delete test do? -- Thanks Mark Phippard http://markphip.blogspot.com/ --000e0ce0f7b45af0bd04b0c18949 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 10:39 AM, Neels J Hofmeyr <neels@elego.de> wrote:

It seems to show an improvement on 'svn delete' for 1.7.0.

Yep, I noticed that. =A0FWIW, the benchmarks th= at I wrote also show delete being faster with 1.7.x:


In my case, = delete is deleting a folder that contains a lot of files. =A0Perhaps we nee= d a test that is doing:

$ svn rm folder/*

That seems t= o be the main area where there is a problem.

What = does your delete test do?


-- Thanks

Mark Phippard
ht= tp://markphip.blogspot.com/
--000e0ce0f7b45af0bd04b0c18949--