Mailing-List: contact users-help@subversion.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of markphip@gmail.com designates
 209.85.213.43 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CA+BQ1vH+=jgH7gw8BVSEefSWTCpkpuP2mzTPMBz8OszNtKTj6Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CA+BQ1vGcHy8infeX3i=xH6HL42az2BKZzjUYSbmu8_H8+3M4Lg@mail.gmail.com>
	<20111006175527.GA21041@daniel3.local>
	<CAOAgVpwq6GFiwwd2H0OgaO5RXzx5tZkcgAkgsVFp8SGdJ5dwGQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<20111006185122.GA22006@daniel3.local>
	<CAOAgVpztEA=v1UtQiN9vhdQma+vVBMWu5Z0gZJn5vnZvaFL_pA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+BQ1vH+=jgH7gw8BVSEefSWTCpkpuP2mzTPMBz8OszNtKTj6Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2011 16:31:39 -0400
Message-ID: 
 <CAHFaGCpdEDZEwNE5wzZX1i-jB3VMPNqVizMSWGhXx3-okqgOHw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Subversion and Remote Repository Synchronization
From: Mark Phippard <markphip@gmail.com>
To: David Weintraub <qazwart@gmail.com>
Cc: Les Mikesell <lesmikesell@gmail.com>,
 Daniel Shahaf <d.s@daniel.shahaf.name>,
	Subversion <users@subversion.apache.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 4:23 PM, David Weintraub <qazwart@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 1:51 PM, Daniel Shahaf <d.s@daniel.shahaf.name> wrote:
>>
>>>> >> What about using "svngit"? We could have an automated process that
>>>> >> pulls data from the Subversion repository in the U.S. and creates a
>>>> >> local Git repository in India using "svngit'. This could be done when
>>>> >> there's no one in the Indian office. Developers could then checkout
>>>> >> and commit their changes to their local Git repository. In the middle
>>>> >> of the night, the Git repository could then push its changes to
>>>> >> Subversion using "gitsvn" Is this a possibility?
>
> On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 3:49 PM, Les Mikesell <lesmikesell@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I don't have experience with using git-svn myself, but it seems to be
>> designed to handle that scenario.
>
> Svn-git was mainly designed to allow you to checkpoint your work
> without checking in code you know might not work.
>
> What I am thinking is something a bit more radical: Using Git as a
> local repository for a remote Subversion repository. Now, you're
> talking about 10 to 20 or more users in your remote site using Git,
> pushing their changes to the local central Git repository, and then
> having that central Git repository sync itself back to the Subversion
> repository. You're hope is that the site that has the Subversion
> repository isn't doing to many changes while the remote site is
> active. And, the remote site isn't active while the local site is
> committing changes into Subversion.

Have you seen this?

http://subgit.com/

It is something the guys that make SVNKit have been working on.


-- 
Thanks

Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/