Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-subversion-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-subversion-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D7BE59DB3 for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 20:34:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 51652 invoked by uid 500); 21 Oct 2011 20:34:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-subversion-users-archive@subversion.apache.org Received: (qmail 51628 invoked by uid 500); 21 Oct 2011 20:34:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@subversion.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list users@subversion.apache.org Received: (qmail 51621 invoked by uid 99); 21 Oct 2011 20:34:52 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 20:34:52 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ehuels@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.43 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.43] (HELO mail-qw0-f43.google.com) (209.85.216.43) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 20:34:45 +0000 Received: by qabg1 with SMTP id g1so4856967qab.16 for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 13:34:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=yY4sn7X1gCJ6BXb7HEDmZkHIaE7QAmlvtxdhBQcTJsA=; b=Ru1QnYg9QQcAO9Y+DAd13I1thesiAGII/Mc055zVCpjWVxn378sAbBiN5DLSZl2/gn kMOzrbgFc7BX6yiY5caEVTmbgKElURmxdLtUqQ+SXz85vXGvp4ybBt5nHKuxLZRGSziq oukeAqw0Ss3vvhDV/I4SZT/ktR10ZCDfSY6H8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.136.68 with SMTP id py4mr1389295obb.39.1319229264695; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 13:34:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.182.154.106 with HTTP; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 13:34:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 22:34:24 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Why Subversion 1.7.1 tagged but not announced? From: Erik Huelsmann To: Bob Archer Cc: Ludovic Lambert , "users@subversion.apache.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 7:11 PM, Bob Archer wrote: >> Has anybody a clue on why SVN 1.7.1 has been tagged in the repo but not >> announced as available? >> According to the release note it contains many improvements and bug fixes, >> teasing me for an upgrade... >> >> Regards, >> Ludovic > > Because it is going through the approval and signing process (follow the dev list). I expect it will be released pretty soon. The status as of three hours ago is: "" Thanks everybody for the quick turnaround on the signatures; I've put the tarballs up for mirroring, and hope to publish the release tomorrow. -Hyrum "" Bye, Erik.