Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-subversion-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-subversion-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CB8C79AB4 for ; Thu, 27 Oct 2011 11:15:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 97244 invoked by uid 500); 27 Oct 2011 11:15:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-subversion-users-archive@subversion.apache.org Received: (qmail 97226 invoked by uid 500); 27 Oct 2011 11:15:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@subversion.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list users@subversion.apache.org Received: (qmail 97219 invoked by uid 99); 27 Oct 2011 11:15:32 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 27 Oct 2011 11:15:32 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [81.103.221.48] (HELO mtaout02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com) (81.103.221.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 27 Oct 2011 11:15:23 +0000 Received: from aamtaout04-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.35]) by mtaout02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com (InterMail vM.7.08.04.00 201-2186-134-20080326) with ESMTP id <20111027111457.QCUG21463.mtaout02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@aamtaout04-winn.ispmail.ntl.com>; Thu, 27 Oct 2011 12:14:57 +0100 Received: from cpc2-farn6-0-0-cust204.6-2.cable.virginmedia.com ([86.16.124.205]) by aamtaout04-winn.ispmail.ntl.com (InterMail vG.3.00.04.00 201-2196-133-20080908) with ESMTP id <20111027111457.PDMS25656.aamtaout04-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@cpc2-farn6-0-0-cust204.6-2.cable.virginmedia.com>; Thu, 27 Oct 2011 12:14:57 +0100 Received: by cpc2-farn6-0-0-cust204.6-2.cable.virginmedia.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2B64A36225; Thu, 27 Oct 2011 12:14:55 +0100 (BST) From: Philip Martin To: Wabe W Cc: Subject: Re: Error when updating References: <20111025161723.GD1005@ted.stsp.name> Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2011 12:14:55 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Wabe W.'s message of "Thu, 27 Oct 2011 10:20:36 +0000") Message-ID: <87ipnahej4.fsf@stat.home.lan> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Cloudmark-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=JvdXmxIgLJv2/GthKqHpGJEEHukvLcvELVXUanXFreg= c=1 sm=0 a=dmETdrZ3I3YA:10 a=sOaj6hhuNKAA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=69EAbJreAAAA:8 a=IrAPQbbUEzOJTCvYJr8A:9 a=u4Czbdyoif3sGAEUa7oA:7 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=EfJqPEOeqlMA:10 a=HpAAvcLHHh0Zw7uRqdWCyQ==:117 Wabe W writes: > I also tried a checkout of a(n existing) repository to a different > location. I get the same error message when I try to update. This is reproducible? You checkout some revision R1 and update to R2 and see the error? Can you describe the changes between R1 and R2? Is there a single revision that causes the problem: checkout R1 and update revision by revision to R2 to determine when the error occurs. > Maybe it is like this because our SVN server has not yet been upgraded to 1.7. > Although release notes say: > "Older clients and servers interoperate transparently with 1.7 > servers and clients. However, some of the new 1.7 features may > not be available unless both client and server are the latest > version. There are also cases where a new feature will work > but will run less efficiently if the client is new and the > server old." > It seems to me that SVN Update is not a 'new feature' and, therefore, > it should work, right? (Anyway, I will request an update of our > server.) Regards, The server version should be irrelevant. -- Philip