Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-subversion-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-subversion-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 380976370 for ; Mon, 4 Jul 2011 17:32:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 34255 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jul 2011 17:32:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-subversion-users-archive@subversion.apache.org Received: (qmail 34242 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jul 2011 17:32:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@subversion.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list users@subversion.apache.org Received: (qmail 34232 invoked by uid 99); 4 Jul 2011 17:32:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Jul 2011 17:32:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.214.43] (HELO mail-bw0-f43.google.com) (209.85.214.43) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Jul 2011 17:32:36 +0000 Received: by bwd7 with SMTP id 7so7276864bwd.16 for ; Mon, 04 Jul 2011 10:32:14 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.36.7 with SMTP id r7mr6036643bkd.2.1309800734692; Mon, 04 Jul 2011 10:32:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.10.88 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Jul 2011 10:32:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [66.90.219.210] In-Reply-To: <20110704145008.GE25509@ted.stsp.name> References: <20110703182030.GC10944@ted.stsp.name> <20110704145008.GE25509@ted.stsp.name> Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2011 12:32:14 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: RPM packaging components in trunk out of date and dangerous From: Hyrum K Wright To: Nico Kadel-Garcia , Subversion Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 9:50 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote: > On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 09:29:56AM -0500, Hyrum K Wright wrote: >> For what it's worth, this isn't the first complaint I've heard about >> the spec files we "maintain" in our tree. > > That is because Nico keeps bringing it up :) Actually, no. I've heard this complaint from *other* people, not just Nico. :) -Hyrum