Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-subversion-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-subversion-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4F5196BD2 for ; Fri, 8 Jul 2011 17:20:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 5199 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2011 17:20:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-subversion-users-archive@subversion.apache.org Received: (qmail 5143 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2011 17:20:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@subversion.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list users@subversion.apache.org Received: (qmail 5136 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jul 2011 17:20:34 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Jul 2011 17:20:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [66.111.4.29] (HELO out5.smtp.messagingengine.com) (66.111.4.29) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Jul 2011 17:20:26 +0000 Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.46]) by gateway1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E99A12035F; Fri, 8 Jul 2011 13:20:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend1.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.160]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 08 Jul 2011 13:20:05 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=messagingengine.com; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=smtpout; bh=nTwvYvmxgGh3ajpAafUjfxbpL1U=; b=rMtLYaz4kfsi5GS/tZF6fqMSi1qNJ+JOHdv5HgZK79xfhK4rLCKy712432Vf6QkAKy64n4/jCRnoIeg2vCBFEDz0Td3p6DHv6jBJeulzWDF6yuBbNDqjw+Zp1qk//ZhKXvTQDf76NbS99xI5ljoDO5k+I9CEgm57Zq84qy20hHM= X-Sasl-enc: pILeTqpNY8GiT3wFLffWVXl8pjL1jT38V1T+X9dQjTVBKYWEXCM4kNOVimG7+g 1310145604 Received: from daniel3.local (unknown [109.67.194.61]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2FC92404447 for ; Fri, 8 Jul 2011 13:20:03 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2011 20:19:53 +0300 From: Daniel Shahaf To: users@subversion.apache.org Subject: Testing 1.7 pre-releases Re: Trials with memcached Message-ID: <20110708171953.GC12468@daniel3.local> References: <83C4EC368F9D4E4E9917570F91F240AFBB78AC@cbr-exch-be1.cea.com.au> <20110707235912.GC5347@daniel3.local> <20110708005812.GB6640@daniel3.local> <20110708091305.GE31699@ted.stsp.name> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110708091305.GE31699@ted.stsp.name> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Stefan Sperling wrote on Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 11:13:05 +0200: > Doing pre-release testing is a great service to the community. > For us, it is a lot easier to handle problems before the release, > and we can respond to problem reports a lot quicker. > > After release we are bound by compatibility guarantees that > sometimes make bug fixing a little more painful. And you might > have to wait for weeks for enough fixes to accumulate before > a new patch release is issued that addresses your particular problem. > > You will likely upgrade your setup to Subversion 1.7 eventually. > Any problems that show up which are specific to your setup will > have to be dealt with at that point. It's easier to spot and fix > problems now, while you're not running 1.7 in production and while > we're still moving towards the 1.7.0 release.