Mailing-List: contact users-help@subversion.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy)
Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2011 16:50:08 +0200
From: Stefan Sperling <stsp@elego.de>
To: Hyrum K Wright <hyrum@hyrumwright.org>
Cc: Nico Kadel-Garcia <nkadel@gmail.com>,
        Subversion <users@subversion.apache.org>
Subject: Re: RPM packaging components in trunk out of date and dangerous
Message-ID: <20110704145008.GE25509@ted.stsp.name>
Mail-Followup-To: Hyrum K Wright <hyrum@hyrumwright.org>,
	Nico Kadel-Garcia <nkadel@gmail.com>,
	Subversion <users@subversion.apache.org>
References: 
 <CAOCN9rzDU-TkChqa8NjXZy3MLkUW-a1XZsk5DSCJCHfrsOu7eA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20110703182030.GC10944@ted.stsp.name>
 <CAFwo6TYgGgrSJc38xPZsgu769SuVyu4uBVtRkiGi7HjbHAU5Uw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAFwo6TYgGgrSJc38xPZsgu769SuVyu4uBVtRkiGi7HjbHAU5Uw@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 09:29:56AM -0500, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
> For what it's worth, this isn't the first complaint I've heard about
> the spec files we "maintain" in our tree.

That is because Nico keeps bringing it up :)

> In our defense, we do
> remove the packages/ directory from the shipped tarballs, so it takes
> an industrious user to actually find and use the spec files.  But it
> appears that the status quo is still causing problems, so fixes would
> be appreciated (or we can just nuke 'em from the repo).

I'd say we nuke them now and bring them back as soon as someone
steps up to maintain them again.