Mailing-List: contact users-help@subversion.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of nkadel@gmail.com designates
 209.85.212.43 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        b=RItFv02EXAAXmVazLdcXK86ErWytOJNWnESCK2TS0I2kGufNdgfKihvBkjPS65z4f0
         PwoJtiqETqzUXk8yTq0WbiggR97+1V1q02BnTGPfAmSyRJQdmq5x/9FdD3/BtgS4G5ad
         DrNXIfUaCdbHjvrpxuVaZN8KW9ISNrfIbcVzg=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20110103182755.GE8279@ted.stsp.name>
References: <87pqsd27v6.fsf@kslab.red-bean.com>
	<20110103182755.GE8279@ted.stsp.name>
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2011 21:37:54 -0500
Message-ID: <AANLkTimcU-w2z_LjrMu0guq5jUpJ+H2KPbmV3GiyYjpT@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Apache Software Foundation response to recent WANdisco
 statements.
From: Nico Kadel-Garcia <nkadel@gmail.com>
To: Karl Fogel <kfogel@red-bean.com>, users@subversion.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 1:27 PM, Stefan Sperling <stsp@elego.de> wrote:

> There have also been reactions by individuals in the community,
> for instance by Ben-Collins Sussman
> http://blog.red-bean.com/sussman/?p=475
> and Mark Phippard
> http://markphip.blogspot.com/2011/01/open-letter-to-wandisco.html
>
> Many thanks to all involved in drafting the offical response for the
> ASF blog and keeping a cool head about this.
>
> Stefan
>

Quoting from the article:

    WANdisco states that this work will commence immediately following
the Subversion 1.7 release (where WANdisco's Subversion development
team are the major contributors) and is slated for completion in 2011.

Whether this means we have anything to worry about WANdisco upgrading
it into confusion depends on when you think the release date for 1.7
will be, and whether anyone will use it in the next 5 years. (I'm
still having a lot of trouble getting clients to upgrade from 1.4.x.)