Return-Path: 
 <users-return-6994-apmail-subversion-users-archive=subversion.apache.org@subversion.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-subversion-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org
Received: (qmail 67428 invoked from network); 13 Jan 2011 13:06:00 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Jan 2011 13:06:00 -0000
Received: (qmail 42671 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jan 2011 13:05:59 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-subversion-users-archive@subversion.apache.org
Received: (qmail 42574 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jan 2011 13:05:57 -0000
Mailing-List: contact users-help@subversion.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:users-help@subversion.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:users-unsubscribe@subversion.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:users@subversion.apache.org>
List-Id: <users.subversion.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list users@subversion.apache.org
Received: (qmail 42530 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jan 2011 13:05:56 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 13:05:56 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.7 required=10.0
	tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of dextrous85@gmail.com designates
 74.125.82.171 as permitted sender)
Received: from [74.125.82.171] (HELO mail-wy0-f171.google.com) (74.125.82.171)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 13:05:51 +0000
Received: by wyb38 with SMTP id 38so1653441wyb.16
        for <users@subversion.apache.org>;
 Thu, 13 Jan 2011 05:05:30 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
         :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type;
        bh=OHAgMibbVvowHrFRGd1y0LeR7p/szn3a4LKKu1VIDgA=;
        b=u3BgwTMWLSMAGBoc8mDtbweZQwcfC2/IkEPD8udqwa6qWNeCZUOfMf9KxYXRaFnlLf
         xb9U9Jp6CyTtCn1UKq5Up6QIOI4DrUGNHxmLWFLNRz0XUZvOagsGDwVCdtfD68YZWwBQ
         WXvsB97BYnVnNp9MevyNSKhuZfXN175+9m0sA=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :cc:content-type;
        b=rLQrhvaaqPswflQSOJcrZxIopyyvgkwMmXVtPPbMsszA3vOzUjIHBYbxXGuwSuW8Lj
         q5722Ain4J4okzX5BCn1J4axVV9LJL57o4vtRkQyd3Oup8RHBRSHHQYkxleVOSPw+thh
         B/tTERRMUUf4I2VzPb5z+P8eGYT7VcBgCXCX8=
Received: by 10.216.28.74 with SMTP id f52mr1995906wea.26.1294923930686; Thu,
 13 Jan 2011 05:05:30 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.216.2.203 with HTTP; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 05:05:10 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: 
 <38E3A921A2B9FC46B02E566BDED7CF4E039E641D@oxfw0e1a.ww001.siemens.net>
References: 
 <38E3A921A2B9FC46B02E566BDED7CF4E039E641D@oxfw0e1a.ww001.siemens.net>
From: vishwajeet singh <dextrous85@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 18:35:10 +0530
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=C-xa2G=Fvhi0px93Eff+-EJ0sEtxq10PuHkgJ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Why does workflow change require environment upgrade?
To: "Cooke, Mark" <mark.cooke@siemens.com>
Cc: users@subversion.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00504502d309e654540499b9f810
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

--00504502d309e654540499b9f810
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 6:30 PM, Cooke, Mark <mark.cooke@siemens.com> wrote:

> Folks,
>
> I've split this out from previous thread
> (http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users/browse_thread/thread/f836f93b
> 25b8b275) as a more specific question:
>
> Why should changing the workflow in 0.11.7 require an environment
> upgrade?
>
> Background from the other thread: each env inherits a shared conf that
> then inherits a shared workflow file (using 'file = xxx' in the
> [inherit] section).  I am investigating why the workflow is not working
> in any env when I broke all my trac sites producing:
>
> <project-name>: Error
> (The Trac Environment needs to be upgraded. Run "trac-admin
> <project-path> upgrade")
>
> ...and the trac.log error:
>
> 2011-01-13 10:23:10,038 Trac[env] WARNING: Component
> <trac.ticket.default_workflow.ConfigurableTicketWorkflow object at
> 0x02B7AD50> requires environment upgrade
>
> AFAIK the workflow is self-contained I the ini file and should not
> affect the environment or database?
>
> I appreciate any insight you can offer,
>
> ~ mark c
>
> P.S. I will upgrade to 0.12, as soon as I have time to validate it,
> promise...
>

This is Subversion mailing list, can't figure out how your question is
related to Subversion


-- 
Vishwajeet Singh
+91-9657702154 | dextrous85@gmail.com | http://bootstraptoday.com
Twitter: http://twitter.com/vishwajeets | LinkedIn:
http://www.linkedin.com/in/singhvishwajeet

--00504502d309e654540499b9f810
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 6:30 PM, Cooke, =
Mark <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:mark.cooke@siemens.com">mark.c=
ooke@siemens.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote"=
 style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">

Folks,<br>
<br>
I&#39;ve split this out from previous thread<br>
(<a href=3D"http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users/browse_thread/thread/=
f836f93b
25b8b275" target=3D"_blank">http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users/brows=
e_thread/thread/f836f93b<br>
25b8b275</a>) as a more specific question:<br>
<br>
Why should changing the workflow in 0.11.7 require an environment<br>
upgrade?<br>
<br>
Background from the other thread: each env inherits a shared conf that<br>
then inherits a shared workflow file (using &#39;file =3D xxx&#39; in the<b=
r>
[inherit] section). =A0I am investigating why the workflow is not working<b=
r>
in any env when I broke all my trac sites producing:<br>
<br>
&lt;project-name&gt;: Error<br>
(The Trac Environment needs to be upgraded. Run &quot;trac-admin<br>
&lt;project-path&gt; upgrade&quot;)<br>
<br>
...and the trac.log error:<br>
<br>
2011-01-13 10:23:10,038 Trac[env] WARNING: Component<br>
&lt;trac.ticket.default_workflow.ConfigurableTicketWorkflow object at<br>
0x02B7AD50&gt; requires environment upgrade<br>
<br>
AFAIK the workflow is self-contained I the ini file and should not<br>
affect the environment or database?<br>
<br>
I appreciate any insight you can offer,<br>
<br>
~ mark c<br>
<br>
P.S. I will upgrade to 0.12, as soon as I have time to validate it,<br>
promise...<br>
</blockquote></div><div><br></div><div>This is Subversion mailing list, can=
&#39;t figure out how your question is related to Subversion<br></div><br c=
lear=3D"all"><br>-- <br>Vishwajeet Singh<br>+91-9657702154 | <a href=3D"mai=
lto:dextrous85@gmail.com">dextrous85@gmail.com</a> | <a href=3D"http://boot=
straptoday.com">http://bootstraptoday.com</a><br>

Twitter: <a href=3D"http://twitter.com/vishwajeets">http://twitter.com/vish=
wajeets</a> | LinkedIn: <a href=3D"http://www.linkedin.com/in/singhvishwaje=
et">http://www.linkedin.com/in/singhvishwajeet</a><br>

--00504502d309e654540499b9f810--