Mailing-List: contact users-help@subversion.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of lists@nabble.com designates
 216.139.236.26 as permitted sender)
Message-ID: <30642926.post@talk.nabble.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 04:03:15 -0800 (PST)
From: JamieEchlin <jamie.echlin@credit-suisse.com>
To: users@subversion.apache.org
Subject: Re: usage of svn_wc_diff
In-Reply-To: <20101209212519.GJ12289@laptop>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
References: <30399137.post@talk.nabble.com> <20101208213510.GH12289@laptop>
 <30413850.post@talk.nabble.com> <20101209212519.GJ12289@laptop>


Daniel N=C3=A4slund wrote:
>=20
> Hope, you'll be able to solve your problem. Here's a script that's a bit
> more clean than the previous one. I haven't tested it much at all but it
> appears to be able to display added, modified and deleted properties set
> on both dirs and files. The '###' lines represents TODO's.
>=20

If anyone else uses this code, I'd just thought I'd mention belatedly that
you don't need a write lock to do the diff. So pass False to adm_open3.
Doing this speeds up execution by 12s on a working copy hosted on an NTFS
volume.

BTW, it seems svn and NTFS don't play nice:
http://superuser.com/questions/15192/bad-ntfs-performance, and this is easy
to demonstrate by comparing the lock/unlock performance on NTFS against a
FAT-formatted disk. Do the new format working copies in 1.7 fix this?

cheers, jamie
--=20
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/usage-of-svn_wc_diff-tp=
30399137p30642926.html
Sent from the Subversion Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.