subversion-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Philipp Kloke" <philipp.kl...@web.de>
Subject Re: Checked Subversions code with cppcheck
Date Thu, 07 Oct 2010 15:04:59 GMT
?I am not sure if I am answering correctly (because I usually do not use 
mailing lists, I just selected the "Answer to all" button of my mail 
program), but I hope so.

I now checked the code again, but with a newer version of cppcheck. The 
results are in the attachement.

If you would like to try to check the code by yourself, see 
https://sourceforge.net/projects/cppcheck/ (the tool is very easy to use)


-----Urspr√ľngliche Nachricht----- 
From: Hyrum K. Wright
Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2010 2:56 PM
To: Philipp Kloke
Cc: users@subversion.apache.org
Subject: Re: Checked Subversions code with cppcheck

On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 9:59 AM, Hyrum K. Wright
<hyrum_wright@mail.utexas.edu> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 9:34 AM, Philipp Kloke <philipp.kloke@web.de> 
> wrote:
>> ?Hi,
>>
>> I used cppcheck to analyze the source code of Subversion.
>> Cppcheck claims to have found five errors and some style problems.
>>
>> Please have a look on the result file in the attachement.
>
> Thanks for the feedback!  I'll look at making some of these changes,
> and let you know how it goes.  (In the future, as this is related to
> the development of Subversion, feel free to send this type of mail
> straight to dev@subversion.apache.org.)

I've incorporated as many fixes as I could, given the drift on trunk.
Could you rerun your tool and report the result back?

Thanks,
-Hyrum 

Mime
View raw message