subversion-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stefan Sperling <s...@elego.de>
Subject Re: Bug report against SVN 1.6.13
Date Sun, 17 Oct 2010 18:54:41 GMT
On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 04:30:41PM +0200, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Stefan Sperling wrote on Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 14:43:57 +0200:
> > Your patch seems to handle copies only. What about locally added files?
> 
> Does this part of the regression patch cover the scenario you have in mind?

Yup. It does cover it.

Does this test already pass?

>     Index: subversion/tests/cmdline/lock_tests.py
>     ===================================================================
>     --- subversion/tests/cmdline/lock_tests.py	(revision 1023400)
>     +++ subversion/tests/cmdline/lock_tests.py	(working copy)
>     @@ -1573,6 +1590,39 @@ def replace_and_propset_locked_path(sbox):
>     +def cp_isnt_ro(sbox):
>     ...
>     +  # added file
>     +  sbox.simple_add(kappa_path)
>     +  svntest.actions.set_prop('svn:needs-lock', 'yes', kappa_path)
>     +  is_writable(kappa_path)
>     +  sbox.simple_commit(kappa_path)
>     +  is_readonly(kappa_path)
>     ...
>     @@ -1619,6 +1669,7 @@ test_list = [ None,
>     +              cp_isnt_ro,
>            ]

Mime
View raw message