From users-return-3968-daniel=haxx.se@subversion.apache.org Thu Jul 29 22:53:57 2010 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on giant.haxx.se X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, T_DKIM_INVALID,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by giant.haxx.se (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-9.1) with SMTP id o6TKrukV013048 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2010 22:53:57 +0200 Received: (qmail 83834 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jul 2010 20:53:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@subversion.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list users@subversion.apache.org Received: (qmail 83827 invoked by uid 99); 29 Jul 2010 20:53:47 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Jul 2010 20:53:47 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,SPF_PASS Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of andy.levy@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.171 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.171] (HELO mail-wy0-f171.google.com) (74.125.82.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Jul 2010 20:53:42 +0000 Received: by wyb29 with SMTP id 29so654908wyb.16 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2010 13:53:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=axIizLZfxth7306u3OKmENxacW1VBuUl+pivDPrtjCU=; b=MgMKiRM2IXvPG9OGbJ2HNQ8r9KTVfP71JjAULhqH+X8ypN8LnusLV8nr4aVkcGohfL 76QDGNC7OYSEZhHFDXuYsMrDE7iZHLHiCywb2w/d3ECoUqex3hQY/7yBWcP13iIiRJi6 5/axy4lJuaqU+DyRBuAR499MOvfGNCexJqTMU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=MZlSpocKwgrmpr1rZQ2y/aGvRB6GZ0q+Kf0RPkLAGvv0QaLbmY5aAS+lBNfNyATPp9 8d51knR8uresItRQDEuvvDwZuG3bmdJhrHB6sFHSKjRh3erEP+A7jKY/rBvlmS2/bj7p jnLcVjVXIfLeEaRxsbK92XeYHB2V9EA1XG2eo= Received: by 10.216.185.143 with SMTP id u15mr701917wem.21.1280436801243; Thu, 29 Jul 2010 13:53:21 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.157.149 with HTTP; Thu, 29 Jul 2010 13:53:01 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Andy Levy Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 16:53:01 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: How to choose between svn & http? To: David Weintraub Cc: STF SVN , users Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.3.5 (giant.haxx.se [80.67.6.50]); Thu, 29 Jul 2010 22:53:57 +0200 (CEST) X-Friend: Nope On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 16:40, David Weintraub wrote: > On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 4:59 AM, STF SVN wrote: >> I already have a working SVN server using HTTP, but I'd like to see >> some other alternatives, especially those which could provide better >> performance. =A0The problem right now is that some users are accessing >> the SVN within a VPN tunnel and things are slow for them. =A0So, if it's >> possible to reduce data quantity, like using another protocol, I would >> take it. > > The standard 'svn' protocol is faster, but it uses port 3690 by > default. It is very likely that your VPN will block traffic to this > port. You can start svnserve on another port, and you can use ssh+svn > which allows for tunneling. > > Subversion is known for simplicity, ease of use, but speed isn't one > of them. The entire .svn directory thing slows Subversion down -- > especially since the entire diff is kept in there. > > I believe you can have a Subversion repository run using both the > svn:// protocol and the http:// protocol at the same time (Is this > true? Somebody respond). True. http://svnbook.red-bean.com/nightly/en/svn.serverconfig.multimethod.h= tml