From users-return-2063-daniel=haxx.se@subversion.apache.org Sun Apr 11 16:59:29 2010 Return-Path: Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by giant.haxx.se (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-9) with SMTP id o3BExSi7019520 for ; Sun, 11 Apr 2010 16:59:28 +0200 Received: (qmail 96191 invoked by uid 500); 11 Apr 2010 14:59:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@subversion.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list users@subversion.apache.org Received: (qmail 96184 invoked by uid 99); 11 Apr 2010 14:59:26 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 11 Apr 2010 14:59:26 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of piotr@kabot.net designates 85.25.143.67 as permitted sender) Received: from [85.25.143.67] (HELO s38.linuxpl.com) (85.25.143.67) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 11 Apr 2010 14:59:19 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[192.168.1.102]) by s38.linuxpl.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O0ycl-00068t-1K for users@subversion.apache.org; Sun, 11 Apr 2010 16:58:59 +0200 Message-ID: <4BC1E3AD.1040808@kabot.net> Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2010 16:58:53 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Piotr_Kabaci=F1ski?= User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100317) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: users@subversion.apache.org Subject: mergeinfo pointed to nonexistent branch Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi, After reading Advanced Merging chapter http://svnbook.red-bean.com/nightly/en/svn.branchmerge.advanced.html i started to think that mergeinfo property (set in e.g trunk) for nonexistent branch or file is no longer needed. This information is neccesary to avoid merge of files that already are merged or to notice what we do not want to be merged. So, i am thinking right? Do you think that delete single entries/lines from mergeinfo property pointed to deleted branches is safe or maybe it is a good practise? greetings -- Piotr Kabacinski a2Fib3Q