C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>>> Did I miss something in the original problem description?  Is that precisely
>>> what is being attempted here and yet it's not working?
>> That is my understanding:
>>
>> On Fri, 2010-02-26 at 22:15 -0800, Alexey Neyman wrote:
>>> It seems that I encountered a bug in 'svnlook pl --revprop': it fails with 
>>> the following message:
>>>
>>> $ svnlook pl --revprop -t 10547-86b /svn/test-svn
>>> svnlook: Invalid revision number '-1'
>> I can replicate this error message with svn 1.6.9 on Mac OS X. "svnlook
>> pl -t" works fine, but "svnlook pl --revprop -t" complains that revision number
>> '-1' is invalid, though I specified a correct in-progress transaction number.
> 
> Okay -- sorry for the noise, then.  That was my fault for not parsing the
> conversation correctly.
> 
> Yes, this I believe this is a bug.  (I'll even grant that using an option
> named "--revprops" does nothing for the illusion that revisions aren't
> really just "special transactions".)

I think the attached patch fixes this, and I plan to commit as much after
some more testing.

-- 
C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato@collab.net>
CollabNet   <>   www.collab.net   <>   Distributed Development On Demand