From users-return-1127-daniel=haxx.se@subversion.apache.org Mon Feb 22 06:59:59 2010 Return-Path: Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by giant.haxx.se (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-9) with SMTP id o1M5xwK3007309 for ; Mon, 22 Feb 2010 06:59:58 +0100 Received: (qmail 29337 invoked by uid 500); 22 Feb 2010 05:59:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@subversion.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list users@subversion.apache.org Received: (qmail 29329 invoked by uid 99); 22 Feb 2010 05:59:51 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Feb 2010 05:59:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [203.94.175.213] (HELO mx10.police.vic.gov.au) (203.94.175.213) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Feb 2010 05:59:16 +0000 ContentSizeBypass: false Received: from unknown (HELO pulml0702.police.vic.gov.au) ([203.25.230.71]) by mx10.police.vic.gov.au with ESMTP; 22 Feb 2010 16:59:17 +1100 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pulml0702.police.vic.gov.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD379F803E; Mon, 22 Feb 2010 16:58:47 +1100 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at pulml0702.police.vic.gov.au Received: from pulml0702.police.vic.gov.au ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pulml0702.police.vic.gov.au [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id PiIFJxkNX4qB; Mon, 22 Feb 2010 16:58:47 +1100 (EST) Received: from pwwml0102.vicpolice.internal (unknown [10.13.12.32]) by pulml0702.police.vic.gov.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FD2BF8054; Mon, 22 Feb 2010 16:58:47 +1100 (EST) Received: from PWWML0402.vicpolice.internal ([10.13.12.21]) by pwwml0102.vicpolice.internal with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Mon, 22 Feb 2010 16:58:47 +1100 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Subject: RE: Junior developers Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 16:58:46 +1100 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <4B7CFDA8.9070409@phpbb-seo.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Junior developers Thread-Index: Acqwdn7Cp8dSZkJRQ8KYjKAdeLOQbgDDStjg From: "Srilakshmanan, Lakshman" To: "dcz" , X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Feb 2010 05:58:47.0162 (UTC) FILETIME=[19193DA0:01CAB384] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi Dcz, One point of clarification. Each JD does ** not ** have their own = branch. Each ** change ** has a branch. If the change is large and more than one = developer is working on the change, they will all work in the same = branch. Thanks Lakshman -----Original Message----- From: dcz [mailto:dcz@phpbb-seo.com]=20 Sent: Thursday, 18 February 2010 7:43 PM To: users@subversion.apache.org Subject: Re: Junior developers Hello, Yes, could be a solution, use branches, but I would like to avoid the = one branch per JD situation also. I'm currently investigating over = review board if you have thoughts to share. FYI the trunk is indeed intended a stable stream. Le 17/02/2010 23:37, Srilakshmanan, Lakshman a =E9crit : > Hi dcz, > > You can write a pre-commit hook or use AuthzSVNAccessFile to restrict=20 > commit into trunk by only Senior Developers. This way the Junior=20 > developer can perform his work in the branch and requests the Senior=20 > Developer to review and merge his code back into trunk in preparation=20 > for release. I am assuming you use trunk as a stable stream. > > Thanks > Lakshman > -----Original Message----- > From: dcz [mailto:dcz@phpbb-seo.com] > Sent: Thursday, 18 February 2010 12:17 AM > To: users@subversion.apache.org > Subject: Junior developers > > Hello, > Here is what I'm trying to do : some user (let's call them junior > developer) should require their commit to be authorized by other=20 > (senior > developer) before they would actually be committed. > > Since I saw this feature on an svn (though I do not administrate this=20 > one, so I can't tell how it is done, but it's svn for sure) and found=20 > it pretty useful, I was a bit surprised not to be able to find any=20 > topic about it after hours a googling. > > Would be very nice if someone could share thoughts about how to set=20 > such feature up. > > Regards, > > dcz > > > =20