From users-return-1110-daniel=haxx.se@subversion.apache.org  Fri Feb 19 09:32:24 2010
Return-Path: <users-return-1110-daniel=haxx.se@subversion.apache.org>
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by giant.haxx.se (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-9) with SMTP id o1J8WMfF020044
	for <daniel@haxx.se>; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 09:32:23 +0100
Received: (qmail 42059 invoked by uid 500); 19 Feb 2010 08:32:16 -0000
Mailing-List: contact users-help@subversion.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:users-help@subversion.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:users-unsubscribe@subversion.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:users@subversion.apache.org>
List-Id: <users.subversion.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list users@subversion.apache.org
Received: (qmail 42050 invoked by uid 99); 19 Feb 2010 08:32:16 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 08:32:16 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0
	tests=SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of bsmith.occs@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.209 as permitted sender)
Received: from [209.85.219.209] (HELO mail-ew0-f209.google.com) (209.85.219.209)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 08:32:08 +0000
Received: by ewy1 with SMTP id 1so665758ewy.36
        for <users@subversion.apache.org>; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 00:31:48 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references
         :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
        bh=yhkdYh2mbxVYeKfLaJwL9EvT2dJWbz71Pl1Ssq/i4lc=;
        b=MMsrAZC0HQ0L1VAvYMW9I8CnuR0VHzZum/P7HYg1d5Pm2u3cgTQyAHrK3J9Nci7o5t
         UGuUR1fyn71J7dFO8YywyT6x3e7ZEswHXI/Yk2wws+OM18FWWHj0BRlXVi06yveaewIp
         M6CN2l7p/criht3tsuRkYYUKFTNNuIw2BRXy8=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :cc:content-type;
        b=AXPspSA5XpP50ZbLDyKcXHcHxm8bAnstpfx8ecwN+LJ6g1cX5g4lb7tyMw8RJHc5DW
         ll60jb/vP0vqi8qY2WfWL4T0GTlXciahgizZiNZx1Ne1AuYVbpxHdLMUoE5QvMGHPd6q
         vxhMNOs4xy5s0PbxT7W6EVKrImR81AYxq/ox8=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.213.100.139 with SMTP id y11mr2913517ebn.50.1266568307906; 
	Fri, 19 Feb 2010 00:31:47 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <4B7DED7B.3030609@propylon.com>
References: <4B7DED7B.3030609@propylon.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 09:31:47 +0100
Message-ID: <28c656e21002190031n168490e4ld53680ca6fe93c95@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: dumpfilter exclude question
From: B Smith-Mannschott <bsmith.occs@gmail.com>
To: Justin Connell <justin.connell@propylon.com>
Cc: Subversion User List <users@subversion.apache.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 02:46, Justin Connell
<justin.connell@propylon.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> If I use a dumpfilter exclude /parentpath/folder_to_drop will the content of
> the parentpath be preserved?

parentpath and everything in parentpath (except folder_to_drop and its
contents) will be preserved.

// Ben