subversion-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Daniel Shahaf" <...@daniel.shahaf.name>
Subject Re: svn commit: r1873943 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/tests/libsvn_fs_fs/fs-fs-pack-test.c
Date Thu, 13 Feb 2020 19:32:36 GMT
Joe Orton wrote on Wed, 12 Feb 2020 14:39 +00:00:
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 02:28:54PM +0000, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > jorton@apache.org wrote on Wed, 12 Feb 2020 13:41 -0000:
> > > Author: jorton
> > > Date: Wed Feb 12 13:41:25 2020
> > > New Revision: 1873943
> > > 
> > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1873943&view=rev
> > > Log:
> > > Fix test failures seen on 32-bit architectures (Fedora Raw Hide, both
> > > i686 and armv7hl) when building with GCC 10 snapshots.
> > > 
> > > * subversion/tests/libsvn_fs_fs/fs-fs-pack-test.c
> > >   (get_rev_contents): Avoid signed integer overflow on platforms with
> > >   32-bit long.
> >
> > Should this be backported?
> 
> If there is no objection to fixing the problem this way, I can propose 
> the backports, it is failing for me with 1.13.0.  It looks like 1.10.x 
> has the bug too - that's the only current LTS branch, right?

According to https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/subversion-dev/201908.mbox/%3Ca28e9feb-1f42-4087-81f8-2976ea50b9c4%40apache.org%3E
and https://subversion.apache.org/docs/release-notes/#supported-versions,
1.9 is still supported.  However, it's 4.5 years old now, so based on
our practices when 1.9 and 1.10 were latest, users of 1.9 would only
expect security and critical bugfixes to be backported.

Cheers,

Daniel

Mime
View raw message