Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47097200D41 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2017 13:41:19 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 459FB160BFD; Wed, 22 Nov 2017 12:41:19 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 8DBEE160BDA for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2017 13:41:18 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 91857 invoked by uid 500); 22 Nov 2017 12:41:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@subversion.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@subversion.apache.org Received: (qmail 91846 invoked by uid 99); 22 Nov 2017 12:41:17 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Nov 2017 12:41:17 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id B08E71A0AC5 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2017 12:41:16 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.702 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.702 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MJwHY2RNPL4x for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2017 12:41:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtprelay03.ispgateway.de (smtprelay03.ispgateway.de [80.67.18.15]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 937CE5F47D for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2017 12:41:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [91.113.179.170] (helo=[192.168.92.24]) by smtprelay03.ispgateway.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1eHUKv-0007Vs-RD for dev@subversion.apache.org; Wed, 22 Nov 2017 13:41:05 +0100 From: Marc Strapetz Subject: org.apache.subversion.javahl.ClientException: Found invalid algorithm in certificate To: dev@subversion.apache.org Message-ID: Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2017 13:41:10 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Df-Sender: bWFyYy5zdHJhcGV0ekBzeW50ZXZvLmNvbQ== archived-at: Wed, 22 Nov 2017 12:41:19 -0000 One of our users is encountering following exception: svn: Java exception svn: Wrapped Java Exception at org.apache.subversion.javahl.remote.RemoteFactory.open (Native Method) at org.apache.subversion.javahl.remote.RemoteFactory.openRemoteSession (RemoteFactory.java:228) ... Caused by: org.apache.subversion.javahl.ClientException: Found invalid algorithm in certificate Unexpected ASN1 tag ... with Subversion 1.9.7. He writes that command line client works fine for him. It warns about the certificate not being "issued by a trusted authority" and then shows the expected "(R)eject, accept (t)emporarily or accept (p)ermanently?" question. This happens on Linux. Any ideas why command line client and JavaHL might behave differently here? Note that the command line binaries are not identical to the JavaHL binaries, but both have been compiled from Subversion 1.9.7. Could this be a problem in our build process? -Marc