subversion-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stefan Sperling <>
Subject Re: swig for 1.10.0
Date Tue, 11 Jul 2017 20:35:12 GMT
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 07:54:58PM +0000, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> As others have said, configure already supports both 2.x and 3.x.  The
> remaining question is just whether should use 2.x or 3.x for
> rolling tarballs. uses own swig version compiled directly
> from swig upstream sources, so availability of swig3 in OS packages
> isn't a blocker for upgrading's swig version.
> (And tarball users don't need swig at all)

If will require swig 3, then I won't be able to roll releases
until the OpenBSD port gets updated. I don't have a problem with that, but
it seems people were expecting me to roll another 1.10 alpha soon, so...

View raw message