Mailing-List: contact dev-help@subversion.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Subject: Re: translations
To: dev@subversion.apache.org
References: <fba23af6-cfa7-4402-3bdb-afcd46012083@gmail.com>
 <71e26c6f-e799-09ba-ea03-fa7287f04c45@foad.me.uk>
 <trinity-9372f40e-7fb2-4ab0-ad6b-f3a47c5887db-1486646195451@3capp-gmx-bs33>
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Branko_=c4=8cibej?= <brane@apache.org>
Organization: The Apache Software Foundation
Message-ID: <258fe378-b274-6f32-26d2-01fe27ea4bae@apache.org>
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2017 14:48:28 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:45.0)
 Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <trinity-9372f40e-7fb2-4ab0-ad6b-f3a47c5887db-1486646195451@3capp-gmx-bs33>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
archived-at: Thu, 09 Feb 2017 13:48:33 -0000

On 09.02.2017 14:16, Andreas Stieger wrote:
> You would not use the .pot but the .po, so as to not loose existing translations.
> For other translations: setting them up in Pootle, I did not want to presume that other po maintainers would want to do that.
>
> Pootle has automation opportunities of scanning the code base, have not explored.
>
> Is that something we want to kick off for the next release?

It wouldn't hurt to bring Subversion into the 20th century, at least as
far as translations are concerned. :)

I can help with any scripting but can't promise to lead this effort ...
NoTimeTM.

-- Brane